Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's pretty dangerous to have a 5 year old who can't swim.
No, it's pretty dangerous to have a 5 year old whose parents think that swimming skills are protective. Those are the parents who do risky things like reducing supervision.
Anonymous wrote:My eldest son could not swim at age 5. We had him in swimming lessons since he was a toddler, but he is a very anxious kid and would not put his head under water.
He is swimming reasonably well at age 6 and will probably not be a strong swimmer before age 7.
My twin boys are swimming at age 4.
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty dangerous to have a 5 year old who can't swim.
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty dangerous to have a 5 year old who can't swim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't you hate when it turns into a brag thread. Years ago, I posted a similar topic on a parenting board just to have everyone tell me about their kids who were swimming since birth.
My twin boys could not swim at age 5 and had just started swim lessons. By the time they were 7, they could just barely make it across the pool. They are about to turn 11 and they just passed the boy scout swim test with flying colors (100 yards). My youngest son is about to turn 8 and he can just barely doggy paddle across the pool so I have signed him up for some more lessons this summer.
I am a TERRIBLE swimmer. I always was despite many swim lessons as a kid. I got to the point where I wouldn't drown in the deep end and could make it across the pool. DH has been instrumental in getting the kids to practice good swimming form. I need him to work more with boy #3.
She asked people answered, how is that a brag?
Because people who claim that their three year old can swim like a fish are not the norm. Physically and developmentally it is unusual for a kid to be a competent swimmer before six or seven.