Anonymous wrote:Buy a 2012 used car for about $17k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leasing, IMHO, is simply stupid. End of the day, you have nothing to show.
I have always maintained that it is a vehicle to drive a car that you can't afford or one that is too impractical to own long term (both of which are poor decisions). I am honestly interested in what PP posted above. Do the numbers work in some circumstances or not? Every time I have looked at it you end up spending tens of thousands over the course of 10-15 years if you lease several cars back to back rather than buying one and driving it into the ground.
OK, let's try the following hypothetical:
Ted is about to graduate from graduate school and has obtained a decent first job in his field. Pay is ok for a new hire, but not that high objectively, with room to increase substantially over the next few years. Ted has substantial student loans, no money in the bank, and $4,000 in credit card debt. His grandmother has offered him $2,000 to use to lease or buy a car.
Ted has never owned a car before, but needs one for his job. He may have to drive clients or his boss around, and so had a strong desire for a new car. He would really love to own a BMW 3 series some day, but recognizes now is not the time. He decides on a Honda Civic. He goes to the dealer who tells him he can either lease the Civic for $129/mo with $2,000 due at signing, or buy the Civic for $279/mo with $2,000 down.
Ted asks you whether he should lease or buy. What do you tell him?
I would tell him to lease the civic, pay of his credit card debt, and, if he is in strong financial shape at the end of the Civic lease term, purchase a BMW.
If the premise is he is going to buy a new car in three years then of course it makes sense to lease. But the point is that if he had substantial student loans, I find it hard to believe it will make sense for him to buy a BMW in 3 years. I know lawyers who graduated law school with six figure debt and got big firm salaries and the smart ones used those ridiculous salaries to pay down debt, save (for retirement, down payment, etc.) and avoided lifestyle creep/golden handcuffs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leasing, IMHO, is simply stupid. End of the day, you have nothing to show.
I have always maintained that it is a vehicle to drive a car that you can't afford or one that is too impractical to own long term (both of which are poor decisions). I am honestly interested in what PP posted above. Do the numbers work in some circumstances or not? Every time I have looked at it you end up spending tens of thousands over the course of 10-15 years if you lease several cars back to back rather than buying one and driving it into the ground.
OK, let's try the following hypothetical:
Ted is about to graduate from graduate school and has obtained a decent first job in his field. Pay is ok for a new hire, but not that high objectively, with room to increase substantially over the next few years. Ted has substantial student loans, no money in the bank, and $4,000 in credit card debt. His grandmother has offered him $2,000 to use to lease or buy a car.
Ted has never owned a car before, but needs one for his job. He may have to drive clients or his boss around, and so had a strong desire for a new car. He would really love to own a BMW 3 series some day, but recognizes now is not the time. He decides on a Honda Civic. He goes to the dealer who tells him he can either lease the Civic for $129/mo with $2,000 due at signing, or buy the Civic for $279/mo with $2,000 down.
Ted asks you whether he should lease or buy. What do you tell him?
I would tell him to lease the civic, pay of his credit card debt, and, if he is in strong financial shape at the end of the Civic lease term, purchase a BMW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on the car and the residual value.
this is the right answer. The cost of the lease is the cost of the car less the residual value times the money factor, so change any one of those factors and you change the monthly payment.
With a few exceptions (like people who can deduct lease costs as a business expense, people who plan to buy a new car every three years, and some electric vehicle leases), leases are generally a bad financial move. In fact, big car payments are an easy way to blow a hole in your monthly budget so I'd encourage you to think twice or 3x about whether that's really the best use of money for the next 3-5 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leasing, IMHO, is simply stupid. End of the day, you have nothing to show.
I have always maintained that it is a vehicle to drive a car that you can't afford or one that is too impractical to own long term (both of which are poor decisions). I am honestly interested in what PP posted above. Do the numbers work in some circumstances or not? Every time I have looked at it you end up spending tens of thousands over the course of 10-15 years if you lease several cars back to back rather than buying one and driving it into the ground.
OK, let's try the following hypothetical:
Ted is about to graduate from graduate school and has obtained a decent first job in his field. Pay is ok for a new hire, but not that high objectively, with room to increase substantially over the next few years. Ted has substantial student loans, no money in the bank, and $4,000 in credit card debt. His grandmother has offered him $2,000 to use to lease or buy a car.
Ted has never owned a car before, but needs one for his job. He may have to drive clients or his boss around, and so had a strong desire for a new car. He would really love to own a BMW 3 series some day, but recognizes now is not the time. He decides on a Honda Civic. He goes to the dealer who tells him he can either lease the Civic for $129/mo with $2,000 due at signing, or buy the Civic for $279/mo with $2,000 down.
This is how we are approaching getting a new car soon. We have been a single car family and it has caused significant hardship to the point that we need a second car. I'm concerned about getting a high car payment or fixing a junker so we will be leasing. It will be for 2-3 years. I don't consider it a good idea for 10+ years but in the short term it works
Ted asks you whether he should lease or buy. What do you tell him?
I would tell him to lease the civic, pay of his credit card debt, and, if he is in strong financial shape at the end of the Civic lease term, purchase a BMW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leasing, IMHO, is simply stupid. End of the day, you have nothing to show.
I have always maintained that it is a vehicle to drive a car that you can't afford or one that is too impractical to own long term (both of which are poor decisions). I am honestly interested in what PP posted above. Do the numbers work in some circumstances or not? Every time I have looked at it you end up spending tens of thousands over the course of 10-15 years if you lease several cars back to back rather than buying one and driving it into the ground.
Anonymous wrote:OP - if you are a young person trying to build your wealth, I'd strongly suggest against leasing or buying an expensive car. Go buy a Camry or an Accord. Save the money.
Anonymous wrote:I think the IS is actually one of USNWR's top lease deals for June. The money factor you're using seems very high.