Anonymous wrote:Former SEM teacher here. SEM teachers are trained every summer at UConn and receive extensive coaching from the UConn outreach staff during the year. Training are also given directly by DCPS. I was very proud of the work that I did with students and was able to recruit law students from Georgetown School of Law to teach a cybersecurity cluster. We had a partnership with the Folger theater and were the only DCPS middle school during my year to present during the Didden Festival. Lastly, interested journalism cluster students were able to be mini reporters for the Washington Informer and interview civil rights giant, Congressman John Lewis. The SEM model allowed us the freedom to explore all of these opportunities. Some of the students were who we would call "gifted" others had strong connections to certain topics or subjects and were able to dive deeply into them. SEM, when implemented properly, works, and can be a great conduit of opportunity for experiential learning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If this is DCPS' plan to attract more upper middle class parents to DCPS like gifted programs in NYC, Chicago, etc. that do, it's not going to work.
Upper middle class families with graduate degrees are not that dumb.
JO Wilson and Burrville are adding it...Burriville just tweeted it (look it up) largely because their feeder middle schools (Stuart-Hobson for JO Wilson and Kelly Miller for Burrville) have SEM.
Anonymous wrote:If this is DCPS' plan to attract more upper middle class parents to DCPS like gifted programs in NYC, Chicago, etc. that do, it's not going to work.
Upper middle class families with graduate degrees are not that dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, you fail to understand what "giftedness" is other than an outdated, overly-restrictive one. I understand you're just armchair-quarterbacking which is fine. However, I believe a link was provided to a peer-referenced research Article which lays out what this is and why it is this way. It may behoove you to read it.
I read the link and now being "gifted" is what? Some subjective measure where everyone is "gifted" in some way. How nice... But don't call it a "gifted" program. At least with the "overly-restrictive" measure,, there was a measure of some kind. Now everyone is "equal" and PC.
It's an enrichment program and nothing to get too excited over.
Anonymous wrote:If this is DCPS' plan to attract more upper middle class parents to DCPS like gifted programs in NYC, Chicago, etc. that do, it's not going to work.
Upper middle class families with graduate degrees are not that dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Don't be too confident with DCPS. Seeing will be believing, and I hold little hope that they can ever get it right. DCPS is the biggest obstacle to economic development in this city.
Anonymous wrote:So it is utterly subjective and the teacher just decides who is interested in a topic?
Anonymous wrote:PP, you fail to understand what "giftedness" is other than an outdated, overly-restrictive one. I understand you're just armchair-quarterbacking which is fine. However, I believe a link was provided to a peer-referenced research Article which lays out what this is and why it is this way. It may behoove you to read it.
Anonymous wrote:People want their children challenged, that is fairly universal.