Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But the Catholic church tells you how to handle it - rules are rules.
The poster has better sources of advice than strangers on the Internet.
Anonymous wrote:
But the Catholic church tells you how to handle it - rules are rules.
Anonymous wrote:13:50 here. Oh, and for the poster with the Episcopalian DH, I'm not trying to tell you how to handle it. That's going way too far for a stranger on the Internet.
Anonymous wrote:
You are giving extreme examples. Episcopal service is almost exactly the same as Catholic mass - hence why an episcopal person would not think it was against the rules to take Eucharist in a catholic mass. Now, if an episcopal person went to a Hindu rite, it would be obvious to him that they don't belong and only observe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As an Episcopalian it may be counterintuitive for your DH to think that participating in a religious service is disrespectful, but that is the case with the Catholics.
There are many situations when a person who doesn't belong to a religious group can participate only in limited ways. For instance, I have heard Episcopal ministers invite "all baptized Christians" to take communion. That leaves out an awful lot of people. The Episcopal DH can't help to form a minyan (maybe if he's Jewish by descent?). The Mormon temple is, as I understand it, off-limits to those who don't belong to the church. I would not speak in a Quaker meeting for worship unless I became a regular attender and then felt called to speak.
And so on -- there are examples all over the place.
Anonymous wrote:
As an Episcopalian it may be counterintuitive for your DH to think that participating in a religious service is disrespectful, but that is the case with the Catholics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very similar. As for communion, my Episcopalian DH takes communion at Catholic mass and it has never been an issue (we've been to a lot of Catholic weddings)
In the parish I'm now attending, there's a remark in the front of the book we use during Mass that says, "We are sorry that we cannot invite other Christians to receive Communion". The priests aren't checking to see that everyone is a Catholic, any more than they're checking how long people have fasted, or whatever, but it would be more respectful of other people's religion to refrain.
Anonymous wrote:It is very similar. As for communion, my Episcopalian DH takes communion at Catholic mass and it has never been an issue (we've been to a lot of Catholic weddings)
Anonymous wrote:
Either that or the priests and nuns were lying about it, or didn't know themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes to communion. No reason not to take it because all are welcome. But if you choose not to, you can go forward for the blessing.
The Catholic church teaches that Catholics should not take communion in Protestant churches. That's a reason for the OP not to take it.
Really? I am a Lay Eucharistic Minister (serve communion) and plenty of Catholics taken communion at our Anglican church. I've never heard that.
NP. Many people do not see it for what it is - the appearance of belief in an invalid eucharist. Have some Catholics done it as a show of community and without malice? Of course, but they really shouldn't.
Invalid in YOUR opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes to communion. No reason not to take it because all are welcome. But if you choose not to, you can go forward for the blessing.
The Catholic church teaches that Catholics should not take communion in Protestant churches. That's a reason for the OP not to take it.
Really? I am a Lay Eucharistic Minister (serve communion) and plenty of Catholics taken communion at our Anglican church. I've never heard that.
NP. Many people do not see it for what it is - the appearance of belief in an invalid eucharist. Have some Catholics done it as a show of community and without malice? Of course, but they really shouldn't.
Invalid in YOUR opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes to communion. No reason not to take it because all are welcome. But if you choose not to, you can go forward for the blessing.
The Catholic church teaches that Catholics should not take communion in Protestant churches. That's a reason for the OP not to take it.
Really? I am a Lay Eucharistic Minister (serve communion) and plenty of Catholics taken communion at our Anglican church. I've never heard that.
NP. Many people do not see it for what it is - the appearance of belief in an invalid eucharist. Have some Catholics done it as a show of community and without malice? Of course, but they really shouldn't.