Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do we assume she's into men?
Because she has dated men?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2192600/Kristin-Davis-emerges-split-Social-Network-writer-Aaron-Sorkin.html
Anonymous wrote:Why do we assume she's into men?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Irony of this thread: actress who played Charlotte is still single in her forties, beautiful, talented and famous as she is.
Correction: she is 50, and a single, never-married mom. And still very beautiful.
So who has she dated and did she use a sperm bank. Why is she single? I'm so curious now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Irony of this thread: actress who played Charlotte is still single in her forties, beautiful, talented and famous as she is.
Correction: she is 50, and a single, never-married mom. And still very beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Irony of this thread: actress who played Charlotte is still single in her forties, beautiful, talented and famous as she is.
Correction: she is 50, and a single, never-married mom. And still very beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Family oriented is conservative code word for hate LGBQ.
Then Charlotte was not family oriented nor conservative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, do you really think looks is the determinant of marriage age? That highly attractive women marry at 18? Somewhat attractive, 25? So-so, mid-thirties?
You really have no clue as to the socio-economic, educational, and personal factors that go into when women and men get married?
It may even stun you to know that many women marrying very young are not particularly attractive, wealthy, etc.
I think if you re-read OP's post post, she listed more than her looks as the determinant. And you also might want to dial back the tone. It's just a silly musing about a tv show.![]()