Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a better question for the OP would be
- "why is EVERY expression of a conservative personal preference for sexuality deemed slut-shaming?"
or maybe
- "why is it that telling your DS or DD to refrain from being cheap with their bodies and only sleeping with those who love and value them - which should ideally be a small number because love isn't cheap either - considered slut-shaming?"
We throw around "slut-shaming" too loosely.
If I express my preferences, live by my preferences, and teach those preferences to my children, I am NOT slut-shaming.
"Conservative personal preference" is way too vague.
"Being cheap with their bodies" is way too vague.
You've said exactly nothing about how you go about determining what's sexually immoral and why. One of the PPs mentioned hurting others (e.g. infidelity). That's a rational moral standard. Criticizing sex because it hasn't been sanctioned by self-proclaimed mouthpieces of a religion invented by bronze aged shepherds is not a rational standard.
Anonymous wrote:I think a better question for the OP would be
- "why is EVERY expression of a conservative personal preference for sexuality deemed slut-shaming?"
or maybe
- "why is it that telling your DS or DD to refrain from being cheap with their bodies and only sleeping with those who love and value them - which should ideally be a small number because love isn't cheap either - considered slut-shaming?"
We throw around "slut-shaming" too loosely.
If I express my preferences, live by my preferences, and teach those preferences to my children, I am NOT slut-shaming.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of it has to do with America's weird puritanical background. Many European-descended Americans came here to practice essentially extremist versions of religions -- the majority of which were Judeo-Christian.
Judeo-Christian religion originates from a time/place/culture (thousands of years ago, the middle east, tribespeople) where people lived in relatively small groups and individuals' business became the group's business because an extra mouth to feed or infidelity that rocked the stability of the social order could result in life-or-death problems. Therefore, sex was strictly regulated (e.g., circumcision, severe punishments for infidelity, commandments against committing adultery or even thinking about sexing up your neighbor's wife). Despite having moved on to a world that, thousands of years later, doesn't drastically change if someone sleeps with someone else (thanks birth control, thanks condoms, thanks surplus of food, thanks potable water, etc), we still have these ancient hang-ups baked into our culture.
I'm as "unslutty" as they come -- virgin until I married DH -- but I enjoy sex and don't see why I need to police it on anyone else's behalf, except for my minor children through teaching them the facts about sex and how to make good decisions about it. DH and I took a vow, and I expect him to keep it as an individual (and expect myself to, too) but if we don't, that's between us, since we are the parties involved in our wedding vows!
To try to shame other people for enjoying their bodies seems really backwards to me. As long as they aren't hurting anyone else (I do agree infidelity is unethical and hurtful), they should go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I felt like there was a lot more public judgment about Clinton getting a blowjob from an intern than there was about how and why Bush got us stuck in a war that cost many, many innocent lives.
Maybe it's the Stalin thing about the loss of one life being a tragedy and the loss of many lives being a statistic. Or maybe Americans blow sex way out of proportion and value the lives of foreigners so little.
You're right on all accounts, but you can spin the bloody deaths of millions as a sacrifice for national security but you can't do the same for the president sexually harassing an intern.
Anonymous wrote:I felt like there was a lot more public judgment about Clinton getting a blowjob from an intern than there was about how and why Bush got us stuck in a war that cost many, many innocent lives.
Maybe it's the Stalin thing about the loss of one life being a tragedy and the loss of many lives being a statistic. Or maybe Americans blow sex way out of proportion and value the lives of foreigners so little.
Anonymous wrote:Insecure betas hate women who they can't have.
Anonymous wrote:If immense amounts of casual sex aren't making you happy, then stop having immense amounts of casual sex.