Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But so what, parents need to encourage more middle schools to be of decent quality, not harping on whether one or the other is Tier 1 or Tier 2. We need more Tier 2's!!
Yeah!! Achieving the tier 2 level is now our goal! Congratulations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, for those of you who have high-ability students, Hardy DOES offer algebra in 7th grade (at least a section of it, not everyone takes it then obviously) as well as a small group of 8th graders taking geometry. By the time Hardy students leave at the end of 8th grade the vast majority of them have taken algebra already. That doesn't seem too shabby to me.
not shabby, just barely acceptable[/quote
What is being achieved by having algebra offered in 5th grade?
By accelerating this much, many students, even those who are talented in math might not totally comprehend every concept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, only charter schools have Tiers. But I am glad to hear that some Latin parents are concerned -
EL Haynes parents are concerned, although I guess most Latin parents would be equally or more insulted if Latin is compared to EL Haynes as opposed to Hardy or Basis........But the Latin graph if you look at the school profile of the drop is a pretty stunning image (it is on their 2014 performance report), and the measurement is valid so it matters. As a Latin parent said, it may mean that the caliber of the students accepted has dropped (I guess as it has become more popular the applicant pool is less predictable, although it is now half white and less than 20% FARMS - even lower than Deal)
But it also means that the teachers were not able to help those kids improve their DC CAS scores from 2011 to 2014 - which is more of a problem, because at least in our experience proficient on the DC CAS is a pretty low bar - it measures skills that kids actually absolutely should have by the grades they are in, so at schools like Latin (and Basis too, and I assume Deal) I would not think they would have to study for it because mostly the kids are getting educated enough with the school curriculum that they have that there is no need for DC CAS "prep."
Did Deal and other DCPS schools measure and disclose improvement on the DC CAS year over year somehow, using the same scoring cohorts against each other the way the charter school board did so that the measurement is meaningful? I have heard a lot of crap about IMPACT....but have no clue whether you could compare whether the Deal cohort improved except that you could split it up by year and see whether the same class of 6th graders did better by the time they were in 8th grade........from 2012-2014 (not 2011 because Latin starts in 5th), taking into account turnover it would not nearly be as accurate but it might be as close as we could get if DCPS does not do it themselves. Does anyone know if DCPS did this?
I think it will take us years to figure out what the PARCC scores actually mean in the lower grades since they apparently expect 3rd graders to know how to type, but for MS it should be more accurate.
why the out-of-nowhere EL Haynes putdown?
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, only charter schools have Tiers. But I am glad to hear that some Latin parents are concerned -
EL Haynes parents are concerned, although I guess most Latin parents would be equally or more insulted if Latin is compared to EL Haynes as opposed to Hardy or Basis........But the Latin graph if you look at the school profile of the drop is a pretty stunning image (it is on their 2014 performance report), and the measurement is valid so it matters. As a Latin parent said, it may mean that the caliber of the students accepted has dropped (I guess as it has become more popular the applicant pool is less predictable, although it is now half white and less than 20% FARMS - even lower than Deal)
But it also means that the teachers were not able to help those kids improve their DC CAS scores from 2011 to 2014 - which is more of a problem, because at least in our experience proficient on the DC CAS is a pretty low bar - it measures skills that kids actually absolutely should have by the grades they are in, so at schools like Latin (and Basis too, and I assume Deal) I would not think they would have to study for it because mostly the kids are getting educated enough with the school curriculum that they have that there is no need for DC CAS "prep."
Did Deal and other DCPS schools measure and disclose improvement on the DC CAS year over year somehow, using the same scoring cohorts against each other the way the charter school board did so that the measurement is meaningful? I have heard a lot of crap about IMPACT....but have no clue whether you could compare whether the Deal cohort improved except that you could split it up by year and see whether the same class of 6th graders did better by the time they were in 8th grade........from 2012-2014 (not 2011 because Latin starts in 5th), taking into account turnover it would not nearly be as accurate but it might be as close as we could get if DCPS does not do it themselves. Does anyone know if DCPS did this?
I think it will take us years to figure out what the PARCC scores actually mean in the lower grades since they apparently expect 3rd graders to know how to type, but for MS it should be more accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately, only charter schools have Tiers. But I am glad to hear that some Latin parents are concerned -
EL Haynes parents are concerned, although I guess most Latin parents would be equally or more insulted if Latin is compared to EL Haynes as opposed to Hardy or Basis........But the Latin graph if you look at the school profile of the drop is a pretty stunning image (it is on their 2014 performance report), and the measurement is valid so it matters. As a Latin parent said, it may mean that the caliber of the students accepted has dropped (I guess as it has become more popular the applicant pool is less predictable, although it is now half white and less than 20% FARMS - even lower than Deal)
But it also means that the teachers were not able to help those kids improve their DC CAS scores from 2011 to 2014 - which is more of a problem, because at least in our experience proficient on the DC CAS is a pretty low bar - it measures skills that kids actually absolutely should have by the grades they are in, so at schools like Latin (and Basis too, and I assume Deal) I would not think they would have to study for it because mostly the kids are getting educated enough with the school curriculum that they have that there is no need for DC CAS "prep."
Did Deal and other DCPS schools measure and disclose improvement on the DC CAS year over year somehow, using the same scoring cohorts against each other the way the charter school board did so that the measurement is meaningful? I have heard a lot of crap about IMPACT....but have no clue whether you could compare whether the Deal cohort improved except that you could split it up by year and see whether the same class of 6th graders did better by the time they were in 8th grade........from 2012-2014 (not 2011 because Latin starts in 5th), taking into account turnover it would not nearly be as accurate but it might be as close as we could get if DCPS does not do it themselves. Does anyone know if DCPS did this?
I think it will take us years to figure out what the PARCC scores actually mean in the lower grades since they apparently expect 3rd graders to know how to type, but for MS it should be more accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, for those of you who have high-ability students, Hardy DOES offer algebra in 7th grade (at least a section of it, not everyone takes it then obviously) as well as a small group of 8th graders taking geometry. By the time Hardy students leave at the end of 8th grade the vast majority of them have taken algebra already. That doesn't seem too shabby to me.
Yeah, unfortunately for the Latin cultists, Hardy IS comparable to their object of devotion. You will see that even more clearly once this year's test scores come out. But so what, parents need to encourage more middle schools to be of decent quality, not harping on whether one or the other is Tier 1 or Tier 2. We need more Tier 2's!!
Yeah!! Achieving the tier 2 level is now our goal! Congratulations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FWIW, for those of you who have high-ability students, Hardy DOES offer algebra in 7th grade (at least a section of it, not everyone takes it then obviously) as well as a small group of 8th graders taking geometry. By the time Hardy students leave at the end of 8th grade the vast majority of them have taken algebra already. That doesn't seem too shabby to me.
Yeah, unfortunately for the Latin cultists, Hardy IS comparable to their object of devotion. You will see that even more clearly once this year's test scores come out. But so what, parents need to encourage more middle schools to be of decent quality, not harping on whether one or the other is Tier 1 or Tier 2. We need more Tier 2's!!
Anonymous wrote:FWIW, for those of you who have high-ability students, Hardy DOES offer algebra in 7th grade (at least a section of it, not everyone takes it then obviously) as well as a small group of 8th graders taking geometry. By the time Hardy students leave at the end of 8th grade the vast majority of them have taken algebra already. That doesn't seem too shabby to me.
Anonymous wrote:FWIW, for those of you who have high-ability students, Hardy DOES offer algebra in 7th grade (at least a section of it, not everyone takes it then obviously) as well as a small group of 8th graders taking geometry. By the time Hardy students leave at the end of 8th grade the vast majority of them have taken algebra already. That doesn't seem too shabby to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As others have posted, Latin's MS is Tier 2 because of its low growth score. For example, its median growth percentile in math is 39.8, which is fairly low (the average is 50). However, other posters are incorrect in implying that having high test scores places Latin at a disadvantage in the growth model.
The growth model used in the PMF compares students only to other students with similar prior scores. Crucially, students who are already high-achieving are only compared to others citywide who were also high-achieving in their prior scores. Latin students are doing well on tests. However, these results show that they are not improving as rapidly as other students who are also doing well across DC (at Deal, BASIS, etc.).
Latin's middle school PMF report: http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/309_Washington_Latin_PCS_Middle_School.pdf
More information on the growth model: http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/data/images/dc%20schoolwide%20growth%20faqs%2010_11.pdf
Thanks for pointing this out, PP. The Latin boosterism on this thread is sweeping an important point under the rug. Latin MS is a Tier 2 school because its students are falling behind their achievement-matched peers., at least as measured by the DCCAS.
Why is this happening? Is the curriculum watered down? Is differentiated instruction not working? Other ideas?