Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, the function of standardized testing in college admissions is to provide some level of commensurability among candidates (and/or a reality check on HS GPA). APs can serve the latter function, but not the former, because not all schools offer them, not all students take them when offered, and many students won't have results prior to admissions decisionmaking. SAT IIs test material that is supposed to be taught in HS and that colleges expect students to know when they come in the door. So it's a more reasonable requirement from an admissions standpoint.
Colleges may be concerned about the level of teaching that goes on in AP classes, sure. But I have heard no concerns that the the tests themselves have declined in difficulty. So while a college may look skeptically at the grade of A in an AP class, getting a 4 or 5 on the test should be a reasonable measure of course mastery. Why should a student who has gotten a high score on an AP test be asked to take an SAT II in the same subject? (In fact, many admissions "experts" advise applicants to take SAT II tests in exactly the AP subjects they scored 4 or 5.) What is the point? The only point would be if colleges DO think the AP test itself is no longer a good test of knowledge. If that's true, then why do they want you to take the AP tests at all? Why not ask students to take SAT II INSTEAD?
Colleges may be concerned that they don't have test results for AP classes taken senior year prior to admissions decision-making. But if this is the reason why colleges ask for SAT II scores, doesn't that mean colleges expect students to demonstrate mastery of course material BEFORE the student has actually taken the class?
Colleges may be concerned that they don't have a reality check on HS GPA, or a standard measure of knowledge, for kids who don't or can't take AP classes. And it makes sense to ask THOSE students to take SAT IIs. Again, this doesn't explain why kids who have taken AP classes/tests should also be required to take SAT IIs.
Are the same parents who are on this board complaining about the pressure and demands on high school students and the cutthroat competitive environment in some high schools the same parents who are making excuses for why all this testing is a good idea?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AP tests are different from subject tests. For the OP, some schools require subject testts so you have to look at the schools your child is interested in. A state flagship rarely requires subject tests.
This is correct. The AP ones are the ones scored 1-5. Many colleges will give you college credit for 3, 4, 5. Subject matter tests are different and are increasingly being required by the most elite schools. The problem is that colleges are frustrated with the quality of AP teaching at the high school level. Johnnie applies, saying he has taken 11 AP courses. How can the college tell what that really means? Answer: subject matter tests. My kiddo has to take two in the fall for his stretch school.
PP, what school requires three subject matter tests?
Anonymous wrote:Generally, the function of standardized testing in college admissions is to provide some level of commensurability among candidates (and/or a reality check on HS GPA). APs can serve the latter function, but not the former, because not all schools offer them, not all students take them when offered, and many students won't have results prior to admissions decisionmaking. SAT IIs test material that is supposed to be taught in HS and that colleges expect students to know when they come in the door. So it's a
more reasonable requirement from an admissions standpoint.
Anonymous wrote:AP tests are different from subject tests. For the OP, some schools require subject testts so you have to look at the schools your child is interested in. A state flagship rarely requires subject tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If colleges think SATIIs are better assessments of aptitude, why don't they come out and say that?
SAT IIs, which have also been called Subject Tests and Achievement Tests, are tests of what the typical high school course in a subject should cover. They are not aptitude tests and the descriptions of them have always made clear that they are not aptitude tests. They are tests of what the student has learned, not how the student learns.
Yes, and so why would you need to take me if you have scored well on the AP exam in that subject? If you've taken many APs, why would any SAT 2 be necessary?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If colleges think SATIIs are better assessments of aptitude, why don't they come out and say that?
SAT IIs, which have also been called Subject Tests and Achievement Tests, are tests of what the typical high school course in a subject should cover. They are not aptitude tests and the descriptions of them have always made clear that they are not aptitude tests. They are tests of what the student has learned, not how the student learns.
Yes, and so why would you need to take me if you have scored well on the AP exam in that subject? If you've taken many APs, why would any SAT 2 be necessary?
Anonymous wrote:If colleges think SATIIs are better assessments of aptitude, why don't they come out and say that?
SAT IIs, which have also been called Subject Tests and Achievement Tests, are tests of what the typical high school course in a subject should cover. They are not aptitude tests and the descriptions of them have always made clear that they are not aptitude tests. They are tests of what the student has learned, not how the student learns.