Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought it was BMPV because the only boosters I know for that school do not have children there.
I'm pretty sure there are several DCPSs with the same booster "demographics".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. For example I consider the lack of second language programming a real problem. Others do not. I am also comfortable with a high FARMS rate and don't see that as an issue to bring up.
Doesn't every DCPS have foreign language class? Not immersion, but my kids started Spanish in PK4. I'm very up front about our school not being immersion, although I don't see that as a problem. (cue immersion boosters...)
Yes, but there is a lot of school discretion over how much actual time the kids get, and I don't think the teacher is particularly good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, booster drama. Do you want to hear a story? My IB's 2 biggest boosters were matched this round and have enrolled their respective DCs for next year. One told the other, in a nutshell, "you shouldn't send your kid to our IB school, because you have too high expectations and standards, and I worry you will get mad if things don't go your way, trash our school on DCUM, and leave." Somehow the recipient of that sweet tirade didn't get pissed off and stayed calm and kind and logical and the other started crying and apologized. That was fun. I was that recipient. I have never trashed a school on DCUM. The author of that tirade has.
I really cannot follow this post at all. What exactly happened? (I genuinely want to know.) 2 boosters whose children currently attend yor IB school were matched elsewhere but decided to stay? One of them is you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
I think there is a huge difference between the HRCS boosters who claim that nothing is wrong ever (even when the school is closed for 2 days for mysterious reasons, for example...), and local DCPS boosters who promote the qualities of a school all the while sharing what they hope to see changed, and if you talk with them long enough, what they've done so far to push for those changes, sometimes before they even enroll their kids.
I don't think "boosterism", in the context of DCPS, equates lies or hiding of negative traits. Because the boosters want the school to do the right thing as much or more than they want their neighbor's kids to attend it. There is strength in numbers to ask for the changes that are needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. For example I consider the lack of second language programming a real problem. Others do not. I am also comfortable with a high FARMS rate and don't see that as an issue to bring up.
Doesn't every DCPS have foreign language class? Not immersion, but my kids started Spanish in PK4. I'm very up front about our school not being immersion, although I don't see that as a problem. (cue immersion boosters...)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
I hear you, but sometimes people don't see eye to eye on what constitutes a problem. For example, some parents see "the demographics" as an issue. I'm more interested in how much our kids are learning. I'd feel really weird talking about "the demographics" if someone didn't specifically ask.
+1. For example I consider the lack of second language programming a real problem. Others do not. I am also comfortable with a high FARMS rate and don't see that as an issue to bring up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
I hear you, but sometimes people don't see eye to eye on what constitutes a problem. For example, some parents see "the demographics" as an issue. I'm more interested in how much our kids are learning. I'd feel really weird talking about "the demographics" if someone didn't specifically ask.
Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
Anonymous wrote:Not trying to be dense here, but I am honestly wondering-- does boosterism help? Our IB school is one with a lot of boosters. Before having kids I naively didn't understand there was so much "boosterism" and trusted that when people I had gotten to know relatively well and trust would tell me how wonderful the IB school was, I took what they said at face value. When they said there were no major problems I took that at face value. Then I arrived at the school and realized reality didn't match what I'd heard. The experience caused me to distrust my friends and neighbors and made me feel uncomfortable raising legitimate issues that affected the safety of my child. If I'd heard the pros and cons about the school before enrolling, I probably still would have enrolled but would have felt comfortable that there were other parents who shared my views of the problems and we could work to address them together. To me, if a school has problems and there are people willing to recognize and address them, I'm happy to be part of that. If no one will admit there is a problem where one obviously exists, that makes me want to flee. The boosterism is incredibly icky, but is there as school in DC that doesn't suffer from it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, booster drama. Do you want to hear a story? My IB's 2 biggest boosters were matched this round and have enrolled their respective DCs for next year. One told the other, in a nutshell, "you shouldn't send your kid to our IB school, because you have too high expectations and standards, and I worry you will get mad if things don't go your way, trash our school on DCUM, and leave." Somehow the recipient of that sweet tirade didn't get pissed off and stayed calm and kind and logical and the other started crying and apologized. That was fun. I was that recipient. I have never trashed a school on DCUM. The author of that tirade has.
I really cannot follow this post at all. What exactly happened? (I genuinely want to know.) 2 boosters whose children currently attend yor IB school were matched elsewhere but decided to stay? One of them is you?
Oops, sorry. Neither booster of their IB DCPS currently has kids there. Both were matched this round with the IB DCPS they boost. One of them is me.
Anonymous wrote:I thought it was BMPV because the only boosters I know for that school do not have children there.