Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Plenty of posters have already addressed this comment, but I'll add in a comment anyway. I live in Salt Lake City which has a very high percentage of SAHMs and I don't know any in my circle although I work both outside and inside the home who have not had their kids carpool to some things. The notion that SAHM is equated with your child never riding in a car with anyone else is absurd. At some point most siblings will have an event or practice or game at the same time and this may occur when only you or DH are available and so carpooling becomes necessary. OK, I'm done feeding the troll.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Seems extremely overprotective. I'm a SAHM and both my kids -- much younger than yours -- have been driven by other people. They want to go for playdates directly after school, we carpool to activities, etc. That's not "settling" for other driving, that's not letting my fear deprive them of age-appropriate experiences.
What will happen when your kids get their own drivers licenses?
Well, I was a SAHM and not only did I let other people drive my kid, I knew it was "DH and me" not "DH and I" and "it's" not its. Because you know, attention to detail and all.
Dh and I is correct.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Seems extremely overprotective. I'm a SAHM and both my kids -- much younger than yours -- have been driven by other people. They want to go for playdates directly after school, we carpool to activities, etc. That's not "settling" for other driving, that's not letting my fear deprive them of age-appropriate experiences.
What will happen when your kids get their own drivers licenses?
Well, I was a SAHM and not only did I let other people drive my kid, I knew it was "DH and me" not "DH and I" and "it's" not its. Because you know, attention to detail and all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.
Seems extremely overprotective. I'm a SAHM and both my kids -- much younger than yours -- have been driven by other people. They want to go for playdates directly after school, we carpool to activities, etc. That's not "settling" for other driving, that's not letting my fear deprive them of age-appropriate experiences.
What will happen when your kids get their own drivers licenses?
Anonymous wrote:My kids are 16 and 14 and they have only been driven by dh and I. Its a non issue.
I was a sahm when they were younger so not an issue.
I guess if you put work first then you have to settle for others driving them.