Anonymous wrote:NP here. I will start by saying that I am fine with my child doing algebra in 7th grade. What I don't like here is being lied to. School says explicitly that compact 4/5is the highest option. My child has MAP M scores in the 260s,perfect score on the CoGAT quantitative, and SCAT at 97% for 2 grades up. So.something is amiss here.
NP here. I will start by saying that I am fine with my child doing algebra in 7th grade. What I don't like here is being lied to. School says explicitly that compact 4/5is the highest option. My child has MAP M scores in the 260s,perfect score on the CoGAT quantitative, and SCAT at 97% for 2 grades up. So.something is amiss here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, of course it's not mentioned as an option. It's not an option for most students EVEN the most wonderful math students.
If I thought that it was in the best interests of my child to be in Algebra in 6th grade, I would start by marshal my reasons* and evidence and asking for a conference with the teacher who teaches my child math.
*the reasons would not include "My child's life will be ruined without three AP math classes in high school".
Anonymous wrote:Its not about what's in the best interest of the child. Its what education reformers think is in the best interest of all the children to level the playing field.
If children who are intellectually advantaged are allowed to progress at a pace appropriate for them then they will continue to gain ground over children that are not intellectually disadvantaged. The intellectually disadvantaged child will never have a chance to catch up unless the other child is held back.
Along those lines public educators don't define their goal as providing the best education or appropriate education for a child to reach their potential. Public educators define their goal based on getting a large demographic to a base standard. If the intellectually advantaged kids are already there, job is done. Its a waste of time and resources from their perspective to do anything for those children. Expending any effort to bus or change class assignments for those children who are ready to work at a more appropriate level doesn't do anything for the school staff. Keeping those kids parked in classes where they require no instruction and deliver high test scores does benefit the school staff.
Anonymous wrote:
No, of course it's not mentioned as an option. It's not an option for most students EVEN the most wonderful math students.
Anonymous wrote:They are just trying to prevent what happened with the old system. Too many people assumed that their child was advanced enough for the top offering and it didn't work well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What makes you think that it's not based on actual ability? Just because your son wasn't given the option does not mean that other parents have pushed. Despite high MAP-M test scores and other indicators it may be recommended for some and not others. That is the teachers call.
Because it is not mentioned as an option. It's secret. Let's take my son out of it. I will tell you there are kids in his class that are crazy good at math that are in 4/5. I find it hard to believe that this unmentioned option is available without a fight.
Anonymous wrote:
What makes you think that it's not based on actual ability? Just because your son wasn't given the option does not mean that other parents have pushed. Despite high MAP-M test scores and other indicators it may be recommended for some and not others. That is the teachers call.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know of 4 kids that are taking math 5/6 in 4th grade at a HGC, so those children are on track for Algebra in 6th grade. It is possible, but maybe not right for your child.
It is not possible. ALL kids will take IM in 6th grade. My child goes to middle school for math in 5th grade now, get straight A's and I was still told they have to take IM. Parents with kids taking it this year says it is ridiculously easy. I agree not all kids should move fast and they do teach terribly across the board, but for kids that excel and do camps and home classes and truly are ready should not be denied. They are indeed being denied.
Unless you're in the central office making the decision, I don't see how you can possibly know what every single sixth-grader in Montgomery County public schools will do for math.
I have talked to multiple parents at multiple schools and it is not offered. It is mentioned at preview nights that IM is the highest they can start. There are kids in Magnet that must take IM, that could probably pass Algebra Honors with their eyes closed. Unless I hear that a 6th grader in another school is offered Algebra 1 from 2014 onwards, I don't believe it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know of 4 kids that are taking math 5/6 in 4th grade at a HGC, so those children are on track for Algebra in 6th grade. It is possible, but maybe not right for your child.
It is not possible. ALL kids will take IM in 6th grade. My child goes to middle school for math in 5th grade now, get straight A's and I was still told they have to take IM. Parents with kids taking it this year says it is ridiculously easy. I agree not all kids should move fast and they do teach terribly across the board, but for kids that excel and do camps and home classes and truly are ready should not be denied. They are indeed being denied.
Unless you're in the central office making the decision, I don't see how you can possibly know what every single sixth-grader in Montgomery County public schools will do for math.