YES, and Before 8:30 -- in the beginning of the year they encourage you to get there at 8 for free breakfast. We average around 8:15.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely consider Cleveland dual Language as a top contender to Oyster. Don't be fooled by the location and the SES it is a WONDERFUL school with an amazing bilingual program that is probably the most authentic one of all of them.
The school is well run nurturing and full of intelligent students.
Are both the teachers and the aides in the bilingual program all native speakers? Also, random question, but do you know what time morning drop off is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PS. OP her again. I also REALLY liked the Marie Reed principal. She seemed really dynamic. I wasn't as impressed with the Cleveland principal, and found the Powell principal to be nonresponsive when I tried to reach out with some follow up questions.
Powell principal is either on leave or back on a limited basis after giving birth recently--so just something to consider, as you wouldn't know that.
Anonymous wrote:PS. OP her again. I also REALLY liked the Marie Reed principal. She seemed really dynamic. I wasn't as impressed with the Cleveland principal, and found the Powell principal to be nonresponsive when I tried to reach out with some follow up questions.
Anonymous wrote:Cleveland's actual FARMs number is 55% or so (if memory serves), and that number is a year or two old because they don't release very recent numbers. That's a bit lower than the schools nearby (Seaton, Langley, etc).
The boundary is much larger this year, so the population may look different next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Marie Reed does get a great new building, I think it might become very popular very quickly. The question is just how long the renovations are going to take.
OP again. I totally agree, but I think we are maybe 3 years away from renovation completion. Based on what I've heard, I think we'd have to commit to K and 1st in a what seems like a disruptive atmosphere, and I'm not sure I want to do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cleveland has a growing number of high SES families. My child's class of 14 has at least 4 professional families, quite possibly more. That's not a ton, but also not none.
Is that PK? School profile shows 99 percent FARM. I realize that number is not always accurate, community eligibility schools etc.
Anonymous wrote:Cleveland has a growing number of high SES families. My child's class of 14 has at least 4 professional families, quite possibly more. That's not a ton, but also not none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I think the minus to Powell is that the boosters all seem to be PK, and I'm just not sure of the quality of the program for K and beyond. I haven't really spoken to anyone who has done the program in those grades. But I would love to! Anyone?
19:12, I agree with your rankings for Oyster and Bancroft. We have a low (under 10) number for Oyster, but I don't think those waitlists are going to move at all, so I don't expect to get in there. Our number at Bancroft is much higher than the others, and they took no one OOB last year, so I don't expect to get in there. But, can you tell me why you would rank it MR, Powell, and then Cleveland? Cleveland definitely has the best test scores...but then, it has the fewest ELL, by far. I like the diversity of MR, and that it's been around for so long, but I worry about the distractions that building would pose to learning. Cleveland gives me pause because it's less than 30% Latino, and I really would like the kids in a program with more Latinos. I also feel like I have not been able to speak with enough people to really gauge the quality of the programs. Anyway, those are my rough pro/cons, and would love to hear your reasoning.
I talked with the MR principal about the renovations. They are still very early in the process, and have few details available.
I ranked Cleveland lower because it has few to no middle clas families and fewer native speakers, and you want at least one of those in a dual language, preferably both. Oyster clearly has both, Bancroft has the native speakers, plus a critical mass of middle class though not approaching Oyster demographics, Marie Reed similar to Bancroft in MR's dual language track, Powell and Bruce Monroe have the native speakers but few or no middle class past PK. But another PP pointed out that native speakers at Cleveland are concentrated in the dual language track, which helps.
I agree with PP that objectively Bruce Monroe is similar to Powell, but just doesn't get the boosting Powell does.
Another thing, I prefer the "dual language only" model that Oyster and Bancroft have (and Bruce Monroe?) and I wonder if other schools will consider it. It focuses the school's mission, makes hiring simpler (albeit more difficult), and makes it more likely you'll have a critical mass of parents !!and teachers !! committed to bilingualism and so on. I think it's no coincidence that Oyster chose this model many years ago.
Yes, I believe that Bruce Monroe no longer has an English track in any grade.
As a neighborhood school they have to.