Anonymous wrote:Yes, it's a bad idea. I see why it makes sense for some women to SAH for a few years, and totally get why people want to do that. But I don't understand staying home for several years at a time. It's not just about divorce, which statistically becomes less likely among college educated couples who marry mid 20s or later and have been married 10 years (which describes most of my circle), but underemployment, getting laid off, and death are much more likely. I've been shocked by how many people I know who have lost a spouse in their 40s. It's heartbreaking, devastating, but not really that rare. And these are healthy, fit people. I have a ridiculously athletic friend in her late 30s who out of nowhere discovered she has a brain tumor. Prognosis is good, but you just never know.
When my oldest starts middle school in a few years, I'll have been in the workforce for 20 years (working at least 4 days a week the entire time except for maternity leaves). I have an advanced degree and a great resume. I may step back, but I will definitely continue working in some capacity, either as an independent consultant or PT somewhere. I will probably ramp up again later. I don't think it's a good idea to step out of the workforce for more than 5 years, for anyone.
My mom was a great role model in that way. My dad was incredibly successful - a COO of a large national corporation. My mom stayed home for 6 years but when her youngest started first grade she went back PT (about 20 hours a week. Granted, we lived in less dense area than the DC area so her commute was 15 minutes which also helped). She kept up her teaching certifications etc. My parents have been married almost 50 years and are happy, but she's always worked once her kids started school in some capacity. She recently got a full time job opportunity that she ultimately decided to turn down and continue PT- it paid very little (though they retired in a very small town with very low cost of living) but if she needed it, it would have provided a steady salary and good benefits at least. I always want to be in a position where I can get a job.
I also think that when women leave the workforce entirely for years, they make it hard on themselves getting back in, meaning I've had many friends tell me they intended to go back once their kids started school, but they aren't confident and it's totally overwhelming to start from scratch applying for jobs. So it's a bit self-defeating for them and they put it off because they can. My advice to my two daughters is to get a great education, work hard, and if they do decide to stay home, have a plan for getting back in, in some capacity after a few years.
Anonymous wrote:I left my career twelve years ago and have never looked back. In truth, I disliked my last job - though not my profession - so leaving that job stay home and raise a family was an easy decision. In my case, I am fortunate to have a strong marriage - of more than 20 years - to a wonderful husband and father. And we are also fortunate that DH has had a successful career. I know, as a professional, that it could work again if future circumstances dictate that. I hope to volunteer more as the children leave the house, in any case. The decision to leave one's profession is a risk, certainly, but if would never advise someone against it just because there is some risk - if that is what they want to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the time to consider because you can't extrapolate out from individual couples. In other words, it's all micro, no macro. I'm sorry your husband had mental problems and you got divorced but that has nothing to do with me. Every marriage is different and no one knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it.
How wonderful to have 1000% certainty that nothing bad will ever befall you.
I agree with PP. My parents are together, reasonably happily, as are DH's parents. While either DH or I could lose our health or our jobs, I don't foresee divorce in our future. Our kids are young, we're still paying off debt and living paycheck-to-paycheck (yes, I 'm working part-time because we can't afford for me to SAHM, we tried it). When we're more financially secure, then we'll make better plans for future disasters.
I don't see divorce in my future either, but what about an extreme illness or accident leading my husband to be out of work for a very long period of time?
That is a problem all couples face.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the time to consider because you can't extrapolate out from individual couples. In other words, it's all micro, no macro. I'm sorry your husband had mental problems and you got divorced but that has nothing to do with me. Every marriage is different and no one knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it.
How wonderful to have 1000% certainty that nothing bad will ever befall you.
I agree with PP. My parents are together, reasonably happily, as are DH's parents. While either DH or I could lose our health or our jobs, I don't foresee divorce in our future. Our kids are young, we're still paying off debt and living paycheck-to-paycheck (yes, I 'm working part-time because we can't afford for me to SAHM, we tried it). When we're more financially secure, then we'll make better plans for future disasters.
I don't see divorce in my future either, but what about an extreme illness or accident leading my husband to be out of work for a very long period of time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the time to consider because you can't extrapolate out from individual couples. In other words, it's all micro, no macro. I'm sorry your husband had mental problems and you got divorced but that has nothing to do with me. Every marriage is different and no one knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it.
How wonderful to have 1000% certainty that nothing bad will ever befall you.
I agree with PP. My parents are together, reasonably happily, as are DH's parents. While either DH or I could lose our health or our jobs, I don't foresee divorce in our future. Our kids are young, we're still paying off debt and living paycheck-to-paycheck (yes, I 'm working part-time because we can't afford for me to SAHM, we tried it). When we're more financially secure, then we'll make better plans for future disasters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally, I think that a woman should always keep her foot in the door but because of the price of child care and the stress of being a working mom, some women feel the need to stay at home for their own sanity. Perhaps the bigger issue is how can we make motherhood and working compatible.
Well said.
+1, very good point. The labor force participation rate amongst mothers in the US is shockingly low compared to other developed countries. That's a problem when the courts aren't providing much for the stay at home partner (usually the woman) after a divorce.
Division of marital assets and support depends a great deal on the length of the marriage. It is still generally the case in marriages of twenty or more years duration, wherein the working spouse is very successful, that the non-working partner will be awarded at least half the assets, as well as generous child and spousal support based on the accustomed standard of living. For some ex-spouses, that settlement will be more than enough to see them through a comfortable retirement (i.e., they are in no worse a position than if they had worked and saved for retirement themselves).
Anonymous wrote:Not all men are abusive and drug addicts. I was raised where women work and my mom for your logic was horrified that I stayed home. It was unheard of in our family. I have a masters degree but if I go back now - 5 years out, my income will be small and I'd basically have to start all over so its not worth it to me. Plus, our children have some very mild special needs that still require therapy and support. It works for our family and my husband is very supportive. We've talked about me going back but I also have some health issues. I am ok with knowing my husband will take care of me as it is his second marriage and despite how he was treated by his ex, he was always supportive of her and the kids. If I look at his patterns of behaviors, he'll still be there for me and our kids. but in your case, if he had a pattern, no way I would have stopped working.
I don't have daughters but if I did, I would insist they get their education and work at least 5 years and then make the choice for themselves. I see the benefits for our family of me being home, but having both my parents working was no big deal either so I think its more important for the mom to be happy and ok with her decision as long as they can afford it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the time to consider because you can't extrapolate out from individual couples. In other words, it's all micro, no macro. I'm sorry your husband had mental problems and you got divorced but that has nothing to do with me. Every marriage is different and no one knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it.
How wonderful to have 1000% certainty that nothing bad will ever befall you.
I agree with PP. My parents are together, reasonably happily, as are DH's parents. While either DH or I could lose our health or our jobs, I don't foresee divorce in our future. Our kids are young, we're still paying off debt and living paycheck-to-paycheck (yes, I 'm working part-time because we can't afford for me to SAHM, we tried it). When we're more financially secure, then we'll make better plans for future disasters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the time to consider because you can't extrapolate out from individual couples. In other words, it's all micro, no macro. I'm sorry your husband had mental problems and you got divorced but that has nothing to do with me. Every marriage is different and no one knows what goes on inside a marriage except the two people in it.
How wonderful to have 1000% certainty that nothing bad will ever befall you.