Anonymous wrote:My DH and in-laws are in uproar. A cousin threw a bar mitzvah for his kid, and it turned out there was no meal for the guests, many of whom flew in from out of state. After the ceremony, they were told to go off and fend for themselves, basically. The next day, I think there was a bagel breakfast (no lox).
This is not done, right? DH and family are calling this very stingy and tacky. The old folks are flabbergasted.
I was raised Catholic, and if we don't feed people after First Communion, it's no biggie. I guess you should have some food out for a funeral, though, I don't know.
Is this a massively big deal as everyone is making it out to be, or do they just not like Cousin? There have been whispers that said Cousin is basically throwing hospitality out the window to convert his son's bar mitzvah into a money grab. Is this kind of accusation justified?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree it's not done. Now if everyone is local there is a teeny chance that snacks might suffice if everything is very modest and it's a very small affair. But having everyone fly in? Feed them.
However, I'm not sure I'd want to go to this Bar Mitzvah either. Color me the older brother.
http://youtu.be/PHqCclFaK8g
Holy shit, I LOVED that older brother! To me, the worst thing about that video is the kid is wearing freaking SWEATPANTS AND CROCS. Two things that should be OUTLAWED.
Love,
Your snobby friend
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH and in-laws are in uproar. A cousin threw a bar mitzvah for his kid, and it turned out there was no meal for the guests, many of whom flew in from out of state. After the ceremony, they were told to go off and fend for themselves, basically. The next day, I think there was a bagel breakfast (no lox).
This is not done, right? DH and family are calling this very stingy and tacky. The old folks are flabbergasted.
I was raised Catholic, and if we don't feed people after First Communion, it's no biggie. I guess you should have some food out for a funeral, though, I don't know.
Is this a massively big deal as everyone is making it out to be, or do they just not like Cousin? There have been whispers that said Cousin is basically throwing hospitality out the window to convert his son's bar mitzvah into a money grab. Is this kind of accusation justified?
So if you're saying this is basically what happened, what actually happened? Did the family offer to bring everyone home for lunch, and no one liked that idea? Or a specific restaurant that no one could agree on? Was there a small food offering that people felt was inadequate? Was the actual celebration the following day (which you feel is inadequate)
It would be customary to provide a meal afterwarda but not necessary.
Anonymous wrote:My DH and in-laws are in uproar. A cousin threw a bar mitzvah for his kid, and it turned out there was no meal for the guests, many of whom flew in from out of state. After the ceremony, they were told to go off and fend for themselves, basically. The next day, I think there was a bagel breakfast (no lox).
This is not done, right? DH and family are calling this very stingy and tacky. The old folks are flabbergasted.
I was raised Catholic, and if we don't feed people after First Communion, it's no biggie. I guess you should have some food out for a funeral, though, I don't know.
Is this a massively big deal as everyone is making it out to be, or do they just not like Cousin? There have been whispers that said Cousin is basically throwing hospitality out the window to convert his son's bar mitzvah into a money grab. Is this kind of accusation justified?
Anonymous wrote:Are you sure there wasn't a misunderstanding?
I ask because the new "trend" as a pp mentioned is that the young person has the festive meal much later in the day. In other words, the ceremony part of the Bar Mitzvah takes place at around 10:00 in the morning and then the guests go off (fend for themselves so to speak) but regather around 6 or 8 pm, often at a restaurant or disco for a formal meal and dancing and speeches and so forth.
I find this hugely inconvenient, by the way, as I travel from out of town too, and am left to "fend for myself" for six or eight hours in another city with my children. It's a trend I greatly dislike.
So I wonder if your relatives just misunderstood that they were to fend for themselves until the time of the party?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they couldn't afford a big meal. They did provide brunch the next day. The bar mitzvah is about the boy, not the food. Usually invitations will indicate whether a meal will be served. The guests should have known beforehand what the food situation would be. This could not have been a surprise. They could have decided to snub the bar mitzvah boy because of the food situation.