Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is ONE AA child in PK (out of 80) kids at Janney this year and this child has white parents.
Not true.
Signed,
Parent of DC at Janney in PK.
Agreed, from another PK parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is ONE AA child in PK (out of 80) kids at Janney this year and this child has white parents.
Not true.
Signed,
Parent of DC at Janney in PK.
Anonymous wrote:There is ONE AA child in PK (out of 80) kids at Janney this year and this child has white parents.
Anonymous wrote:I think the most important thing is the quality of education at a school, not the "diversity". I think parents need to focus on this, rather than the percentage of kids who "look" a certain way.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious as to why JKLMM doesn't include E!H and S.
Why aren't Eaton, Hearst and Stoddert considered in the same league?
Anonymous wrote:I am the parent of an AA boy in a JKLM school. Although I am happy with the quality of education my ds is receiving, I have dealt with the issue of having my ds labeled negatively and I believe it is bc of his race. I notice that this has happened with the few teachers that are either less experienced and/or have poor classroom management skills. One teacher in particular had problems with all of the more energetic and spirited children but I feel like my ds' behavior was characterized in a more negative light when other children engaged in the same activity were not viewed the same way. His early childhood teacher, who was a first year teacher, told me she thought he had a learning disability. Having once been an early childhood teacher myself, I knew this was not the case and the teacher he had the following year (who was once a DCPS teacher of the year) thought the idea was ridiculous. Fwiw, he performs well academically and is in no need of specialized services.
I would like to add that I am not overly sensitive and completely back up his teachers when justified and counsel my ds accordingly. However, there is no denying teachers are human and some bring their personal biases to the job. When that is the case, I advocate like heck for my ds and have no problem questioning anything I feel is rooted in such biases.
Anonymous wrote:Janney doesn't have "Special Ed" - it is an inclusion school which means students with special needs are helped through pull outs or more commonly one-on-one work with the roving inclusion teachers that is conducted in the classrooms.
Janney also doesn't label kids as "bad;" behavioral problems are viewed as a child needing help coping with something (whether academic, social or emotional) and are dealt with by a team that includes the special ed coordinator, the school psychologist, other relevant teachers and staff members, and generally the parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, if you are interested in a diverse school in NWDC in your neighborhood, you might look at Hearst.
Hearst may be a school in the neighborhood but it is decidedly not a "neighborhood school." Fewer than 20% of the students come from in-boundaries.
Well, but so what? If OP lives IB for Janney, it's reasonably close to their house, which I assume is an attractive feature of a school, as one actually has to travel there on a daily basis. There isn't going to be a school in that part of the city that does both -- draws from the neighborhood population AND has a reasonable share of AA kids -- because there are just fewer numbers of AA families in that part of town.
Anonymous wrote:I am the parent of an AA boy in a JKLM school. Although I am happy with the quality of education my ds is receiving, I have dealt with the issue of having my ds labeled negatively and I believe it is bc of his race. I notice that this has happened with the few teachers that are either less experienced and/or have poor classroom management skills. One teacher in particular had problems with all of the more energetic and spirited children but I feel like my ds' behavior was characterized in a more negative light when other children engaged in the same activity were not viewed the same way. His early childhood teacher, who was a first year teacher, told me she thought he had a learning disability. Having once been an early childhood teacher myself, I knew this was not the case and the teacher he had the following year (who was once a DCPS teacher of the year) thought the idea was ridiculous. Fwiw, he performs well academically and is in no need of specialized services.
I would like to add that I am not overly sensitive and completely back up his teachers when justified and counsel my ds accordingly. However, there is no denying teachers are human and some bring their personal biases to the job. When that is the case, I advocate like heck for my ds and have no problem questioning anything I feel is rooted in such biases.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:11:31 I agree that the quality of the education (however you might measure that) is among the most important things to look for in a school. But as the parent of mixed-race children, I also want my children to look around and see all kinds of different people, both among teachers and fellow students. And as a PP noted, boys already have a hard time in most school settings -- and the research clearly shows that active boys, and active AA boys, are the first to be labeled disruptive.
This is just like our family. I would look at Stoddert, Murch, Hearst and Shepherd.
Remember that Murch and Hearst feed to Deal for middle school. Stoddert feeds to Hardy, which is not as good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, if you are interested in a diverse school in NWDC in your neighborhood, you might look at Hearst.
Hearst may be a school in the neighborhood but it is decidedly not a "neighborhood school." Fewer than 20% of the students come from in-boundaries.