You need to get it through your thick skull that not everyone is enamored with UVA and other schools may have a better program for their interests.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only good one in the lot is UVA. The rest smack of "daddy is paying full freight because I couldn't get into my first choice."
Duke and Amherst? Really? Both are night and day harder to get into than UVA.
Only a fool, scholarship recipient, or rich legacy moron would turn down instate UVa to go to Duke.
Exactly. But that doesn't make the students rejects as the other poster assumes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tufts = Ivy League rejects
Please stop. Most smart students will not get into an Ivy League. Most smart kids don't even apply to all the Ivy League schools because they are all different. Some are too Greek, some are too rural. Tufts is a good school as are many, many other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only good one in the lot is UVA. The rest smack of "daddy is paying full freight because I couldn't get into my first choice."
Duke and Amherst? Really? Both are night and day harder to get into than UVA.
Anonymous wrote:What is NVCC?
Anonymous wrote:The only good one in the lot is UVA. The rest smack of "daddy is paying full freight because I couldn't get into my first choice."
Anonymous wrote:Tufts = Ivy League rejects
Anonymous wrote:Tulane seems to have morphed a lot post-Katrina. Less southern frat/sorority-dominated, more community engagement. Academically quite good, and they give huge merit scholarships that have lured some top students at my DD's high school (including NMSFs and kids in very top academic tracks who turned down Duke, Dartmouth, Hopkins to go to Tulane and have not regretted it)
What? Says you? Why should anyone make life decisions based on some anonymous poster?Anonymous wrote:Stereotype or truth: "Barnard is a great choice if you can bear attending a college most of your peers (sometimes employers) have never heard about."