Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Their complaints seem small when taken in the context of larger issues faced by kids in class, but for them, issues like kids getting yogurt with a lot of added sugar for breakfast or Dora the Explorer being shown in aftercare once a week are really big deals. Privilege is what it is.
Oh balls, my kid hasn't transitioned to dcps yet, but if those examples were considered entitlement, I would be a mega monster entitled pain. Is this something else you have to add to the "concrete differences between EOTP and WOTP schools other than wealthy families" thread? Do WOTP appropriately limit screen time to zero in early learning, and have some awareness about the health problems from too much sugar?
Anonymous wrote:I still want to know specifically what OP is complaining about at her school. She has given know specifics.
Anonymous wrote:
I was referring to the "against OUR values" part, which the father of a PK parent did say. The "our" in question was not referring to his family but to the school. The parents of older kids who didn't have a problem with the policy looked at him like he was crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[
I actually don't disagree with any of that at all. My own school has a screen time policy that has been problematic for some parents. I do think that there needs to be recognition on the part of the new, gentrifier parents that people do not tend to respond well when you enter a school, start saying that the way they did things before you got there is not acceptable/lazy/whatever without really knowing that much about the school other than what happens in their 3 year old's class. When you're attending a school that many would consider failing and you come in and a once-a-week movie is the thing you fixate on as a problem, the people who are worried about the educational and safety issues in the classrooms are going to see you as entitled.
I am not saying that everyone behaves this way, but I have seen it.
I still have no idea what the OP was talking about about fundraisers and classroom priorities.
I agree, people should be more tactful, especially when they are new and don't know much about the school. BUT. If the school is failing, then why on earth are they having TV rather than something more educational? The issues are connected, at least in the minds of many.
+1. Seems even more important to eliminate screen time in the case of failing schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[
I actually don't disagree with any of that at all. My own school has a screen time policy that has been problematic for some parents. I do think that there needs to be recognition on the part of the new, gentrifier parents that people do not tend to respond well when you enter a school, start saying that the way they did things before you got there is not acceptable/lazy/whatever without really knowing that much about the school other than what happens in their 3 year old's class. When you're attending a school that many would consider failing and you come in and a once-a-week movie is the thing you fixate on as a problem, the people who are worried about the educational and safety issues in the classrooms are going to see you as entitled.
I am not saying that everyone behaves this way, but I have seen it.
I still have no idea what the OP was talking about about fundraisers and classroom priorities.
I agree, people should be more tactful, especially when they are new and don't know much about the school. BUT. If the school is failing, then why on earth are they having TV rather than something more educational? The issues are connected, at least in the minds of many.
Anonymous wrote:[
I actually don't disagree with any of that at all. My own school has a screen time policy that has been problematic for some parents. I do think that there needs to be recognition on the part of the new, gentrifier parents that people do not tend to respond well when you enter a school, start saying that the way they did things before you got there is not acceptable/lazy/whatever without really knowing that much about the school other than what happens in their 3 year old's class. When you're attending a school that many would consider failing and you come in and a once-a-week movie is the thing you fixate on as a problem, the people who are worried about the educational and safety issues in the classrooms are going to see you as entitled.
I am not saying that everyone behaves this way, but I have seen it.
I still have no idea what the OP was talking about about fundraisers and classroom priorities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It does not seem entitled to ask for a school to have a no movies/screen time policy for early childhood, in both the regular program and the after care. Screen time for these grades just means that the school is being lazy.
After care programs should not be showing tv, period.
Anonymous wrote:It does not seem entitled to ask for a school to have a no movies/screen time policy for early childhood, in both the regular program and the after care. Screen time for these grades just means that the school is being lazy.