Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, easy. Don't roast me! FYI, that part of the world domestic violence is very common but divorce is not. I have helped my mom the best I can, if that makes me a selfish person I take it any day. The person I was ranting about is my sister.
You need:
1) Jesus
2) A wakeup call
3) Intervention
4) Education
5) A big freaking CLUE
And not necessarily in that order!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Guys, easy. Don't roast me! FYI, that part of the world domestic violence is very common but divorce is not. I have helped my mom the best I can, if that makes me a selfish person I take it any day. The person I was ranting about is my sister.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Maybe OP used harsh language, but remember, English isn't her first language. Her sister has now placed her in a difficult position with regards to her in-laws. Either she has to somehow manage to arrange a meeting from afar, which will upset her mother, or she has to tell her in-laws they've been deliberately misleading them because her parents are separated. And then the in-laws will be annoyed to have been lied to, and then OP has to explain the basis behind the separation, and that's not a good situation either. So I see it as very complicated. And all of this likely could have been avoided if the sister had kept her mouth shut.
I agree. Her sister didn't simply inform her father her inlaws would be in town. She's trying to arrange a date for a meeting. And she's not only ignoring the OP's wishes, but their mother's, too. The SIL shouldn't have anything to do with his - they aren't her inlaws! I'm guessing the sister is anxious to continue the charade because she is ashamed and so is butting into her sister's business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Maybe OP used harsh language, but remember, English isn't her first language. Her sister has now placed her in a difficult position with regards to her in-laws. Either she has to somehow manage to arrange a meeting from afar, which will upset her mother, or she has to tell her in-laws they've been deliberately misleading them because her parents are separated. And then the in-laws will be annoyed to have been lied to, and then OP has to explain the basis behind the separation, and that's not a good situation either. So I see it as very complicated. And all of this likely could have been avoided if the sister had kept her mouth shut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Maybe OP used harsh language, but remember, English isn't her first language. Her sister has now placed her in a difficult position with regards to her in-laws. Either she has to somehow manage to arrange a meeting from afar, which will upset her mother, or she has to tell her in-laws they've been deliberately misleading them because her parents are separated. And then the in-laws will be annoyed to have been lied to, and then OP has to explain the basis behind the separation, and that's not a good situation either. So I see it as very complicated. And all of this likely could have been avoided if the sister had kept her mouth shut.
Why is it bad to explain the basis behind the separation? No graphic details needed. In that situation, only monsters would be annoyed to have been lied to.
The option is to keep lying forever (we all know how well that usually works) or just tell the goddamn truth.
Anonymous wrote:Guys, easy. Don't roast me! FYI, that part of the world domestic violence is very common but divorce is not. I have helped my mom the best I can, if that makes me a selfish person I take it any day. The person I was ranting about is my sister.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Maybe OP used harsh language, but remember, English isn't her first language. Her sister has now placed her in a difficult position with regards to her in-laws. Either she has to somehow manage to arrange a meeting from afar, which will upset her mother, or she has to tell her in-laws they've been deliberately misleading them because her parents are separated. And then the in-laws will be annoyed to have been lied to, and then OP has to explain the basis behind the separation, and that's not a good situation either. So I see it as very complicated. And all of this likely could have been avoided if the sister had kept her mouth shut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Maybe OP used harsh language, but remember, English isn't her first language. Her sister has now placed her in a difficult position with regards to her in-laws. Either she has to somehow manage to arrange a meeting from afar, which will upset her mother, or she has to tell her in-laws they've been deliberately misleading them because her parents are separated. And then the in-laws will be annoyed to have been lied to, and then OP has to explain the basis behind the separation, and that's not a good situation either. So I see it as very complicated. And all of this likely could have been avoided if the sister had kept her mouth shut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:* I meant to say we do not talk about it. I am not going to parade my dad as an abuser to my in-laws as much as I loathe what he made my mother go through and what we had to witness as children.
You don't need to go into the details of anything.
You are really over-reacting and focusing on the wrong issue here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it, OP. Your sister shouldn't have said a thing to anyone. These are your in-laws, not hers.
Exactly! Someone here is seeing my point.
Is that a reason to "hate" your sister and refer to her as "this woman."
Your parents sound screwy and have made you bear the burden of their mess. Release it. It's not your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:* I meant to say we do not talk about it. I am not going to parade my dad as an abuser to my in-laws as much as I loathe what he made my mother go through and what we had to witness as children.
You don't need to go into the details of anything.
You are really over-reacting and focusing on the wrong issue here.
How is it in-laws business especially if there is stigma associated with divorce?