Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:True about Sidwell (lower school). People are very upset but not many feel comfortable speaking up, I think.
Parent of 2 Sidwell Lower School students -- haven't heard anyone other parents mention it either, but I find it hard to believe it hasn't caused some discomfort. DH and I gasped when we saw the letter from the Board but will keep our kids there b/c it's a good fit for them.
Anonymous wrote:True about Sidwell (lower school). People are very upset but not many feel comfortable speaking up, I think.
Anonymous wrote:17:54 again. My apologies if my previous comment seemed dismissive of those concerned about tuition increases. My point was simply that from the schools' perspectives, there appears to be plenty of capacity for their families to absorb tuition increases. The traditional Washington upper middle class of doctors, lawyers, think-tank/academics/experts, and K Street is doing fine. The stock market has more than bounced back from 2008. And there are still far more applicants than slots at StA/NCS, SFS, GDS, Visi, Holton, Potomac etc.
You will find that these schools have a very different perspective on their facilities. First, they are almost always paid by capital campaigns and large donations rather than tuition and debt. Second, I don't think any of these schools think their facilities are too fancy. As a comparison take a look at the public school construction/renovation in the area. DCPS spent $70M on Alice Deal, TJHSST is in the middle of an $80M expansion, Arlington is finishing a new $35M elementary school in Williamsburg, and the BCC cluster will get a new middle school soon. Old line WASPs may like the run-down old money look, but contemporary parents , not so much.
Anonymous wrote:17:54 again. My apologies if my previous comment seemed dismissive of those concerned about tuition increases. My point was simply that from the schools' perspectives, there appears to be plenty of capacity for their families to absorb tuition increases. The traditional Washington upper middle class of doctors, lawyers, think-tank/academics/experts, and K Street is doing fine. The stock market has more than bounced back from 2008. And there are still far more applicants than slots at StA/NCS, SFS, GDS, Visi, Holton, Potomac etc.
You will find that these schools have a very different perspective on their facilities. First, they are almost always paid by capital campaigns and large donations rather than tuition and debt. Second, I don't think any of these schools think their facilities are too fancy. As a comparison take a look at the public school construction/renovation in the area. DCPS spent $70M on Alice Deal, TJHSST is in the middle of an $80M expansion, Arlington is finishing a new $35M elementary school in Williamsburg, and the BCC cluster will get a new middle school soon. Old line WASPs may like the run-down old money look, but contemporary parents , not so much.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While there is clearly a wide range of incomes, I would guess that the typical non-financial aid family at one of the selective private schools earns at least $3-400k/year. So a 3% COLA is $9-12k - plenty to cover an addition $1-2k for tuition. Obviously families making half of that will have a harder time if they don't get financial aid, but there are very few families in that income range. Until there are more slots than applicants, there will be plenty of families lining up to pay tuition.
For the typical family earning this amount, paying tuition for two is tough as is. If we didn't have a $700K mortgage (then again, I'm not sure where we'd live- definitely not anywhere near our private) or save for retirement or college, we could swing these increases. As it stands, we're being priced out and are considering parochial or public. DH hasn't had a raise in over 3 years. The COLAs I've received are insubstantial. We just can't keep doing this.
Before anyone attacks the above scenarios for their high incomes, expensive houses, or difficulty in making enviable choices we should remember that these type of families are the bread and butter of the independent school movement. We all know families that can easily afford the recent tuition increases and still afford the annual ski vacation to St Moritz. That isn't the point. Independent school business models face the challenge of a smaller and smaller community of families who can afford their services, and the competition of improving publics/charters that bring their value proposition into greater focus/question. If I were running an independent school, the population that I would focus most intensely on would be the upper middle class. Not that the rich families and financial aid students matter less - it is just that the model is designed to naturally take care of these groups, whereas the full-fee paying, two working professional parent families seem to be stretched to the limit and without them the schools will become hollowed out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While there is clearly a wide range of incomes, I would guess that the typical non-financial aid family at one of the selective private schools earns at least $3-400k/year. So a 3% COLA is $9-12k - plenty to cover an addition $1-2k for tuition. Obviously families making half of that will have a harder time if they don't get financial aid, but there are very few families in that income range. Until there are more slots than applicants, there will be plenty of families lining up to pay tuition.
For the typical family earning this amount, paying tuition for two is tough as is. If we didn't have a $700K mortgage (then again, I'm not sure where we'd live- definitely not anywhere near our private) or save for retirement or college, we could swing these increases. As it stands, we're being priced out and are considering parochial or public. DH hasn't had a raise in over 3 years. The COLAs I've received are insubstantial. We just can't keep doing this.
Anonymous wrote:While there is clearly a wide range of incomes, I would guess that the typical non-financial aid family at one of the selective private schools earns at least $3-400k/year. So a 3% COLA is $9-12k - plenty to cover an addition $1-2k for tuition. Obviously families making half of that will have a harder time if they don't get financial aid, but there are very few families in that income range. Until there are more slots than applicants, there will be plenty of families lining up to pay tuition.
Anonymous wrote:It's the health care costs. They are increasing way above inflation levels. That plus admin stafF. These schools can't control themselves and keep adding bodies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While there is clearly a wide range of incomes, I would guess that the typical non-financial aid family at one of the selective private schools earns at least $3-400k/year. So a 3% COLA is $9-12k - plenty to cover an addition $1-2k for tuition. Obviously families making half of that will have a harder time if they don't get financial aid, but there are very few families in that income range. Until there are more slots than applicants, there will be plenty of families lining up to pay tuition.
Think you are a little clueless. Pretty tough to get FA if you are making $200k per year. Many people are not getting COLA's or any raise at all. ( I have not in 2 years) That is why the continuing 3-4% really hurts. Yes many businesses have costs but what business has seen their costs rise by 40% over 10 years ( a 4% increase every year for 10 years) except maybe for health care?
I suspect if that was the case they would not be able to stay in business,