Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure I fully understand what this mean for Garrison. Is the plan for renovation over and done with? It sounds like it? The facility so badly in need of an overhaul.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.
Truth be told, Garrison's boosters meant well but played a lot of politics and got themselves pushed ahead of other schools with greater needs. So even if they get pushed back, I can't feel that bad for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This kind of crap is why I only put in for charters even under the old system where there were six dedicated DCPS spots. DCPS just can't be trusted.
This is a bad reason to opt for charters.
I didn't opt for just any charter, and location was not my highest priority. I had seen several DCPS flip flops in our inbound school in the years I paid attention prior to entering and they just continue. Someone should chart out how many broken promises have emerged out of just the past ten years. There is no plan. None. So nothing ever actually happens that leads to actualized improvement. I voted for Catania because I thought he had a plan. I was scared about Bowser, but still hopeful. The announcements of the last couple days have just proven that we have at least four more years without a DCPS system of planning followed by actualization of those plans. I had hoped otherwise. But right now it is looking like there will be no decent plans in place before my child is in middle school. I hope I a Am wrong and my pessimism is misplaced, but either way, I am very happy I put my eggs in a charter basket.
I think your pessimism is misplaced. This reprogramming request started under Gray, was retracted, and is now being put forward again. It seems to me that DCPS is driving it, not necessarily the mayor.
I say that as a (former?) Catania supporter and someone on the losing end of this funding shift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This kind of crap is why I only put in for charters even under the old system where there were six dedicated DCPS spots. DCPS just can't be trusted.
This is a bad reason to opt for charters.
I didn't opt for just any charter, and location was not my highest priority. I had seen several DCPS flip flops in our inbound school in the years I paid attention prior to entering and they just continue. Someone should chart out how many broken promises have emerged out of just the past ten years. There is no plan. None. So nothing ever actually happens that leads to actualized improvement. I voted for Catania because I thought he had a plan. I was scared about Bowser, but still hopeful. The announcements of the last couple days have just proven that we have at least four more years without a DCPS system of planning followed by actualization of those plans. I had hoped otherwise. But right now it is looking like there will be no decent plans in place before my child is in middle school. I hope I a Am wrong and my pessimism is misplaced, but either way, I am very happy I put my eggs in a charter basket.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.
Truth be told, Garrison's boosters meant well but played a lot of politics and got themselves pushed ahead of other schools with greater needs. So even if they get pushed back, I can't feel that bad for them.
Greater need? They were going to be shut down.
The point was that other schools had more significant physical needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.
Truth be told, Garrison's boosters meant well but played a lot of politics and got themselves pushed ahead of other schools with greater needs. So even if they get pushed back, I can't feel that bad for them.
Greater need? They were going to be shut down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.
Truth be told, Garrison's boosters meant well but played a lot of politics and got themselves pushed ahead of other schools with greater needs. So even if they get pushed back, I can't feel that bad for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems as though if you can your project started, then you are ok because they gladly taketh from others (Elligton and Janney for example). Murch and Lafayette should be fine because they are slated to begin this year.
How do they even arrive at these decisions? Murch and Lafayette serve more children in DCPS than if you combine many of those schools together.
Murch has no start date. I bet it will get pushed back a couple years at this rate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor Garrison.
I really feel bad for them. Where are Garrison boosters? They seemed very hopeful on the renovations and the success of the school.