jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:The joke among all the other schools is that Wilson is not diverse it is divided. There's a white Wilson and black Wilson and everyone is idiots if they don't think it is happening...it is a plain as the nose on your face.
One might respond to this by saying the joke at Wilson is all the other schools.
Seriously though, the Yale/jail divide is hardly a new topic of discussion when it comes to Wilson. Your transforming it into a racial division, however, is insulting to high-performing black students that you don't seem to know -- or care -- exist. The achievement gap is real and black students largely make up the lower-performing end of the gap. However, the black students on the upper end of that gap are probably the most overlooked group in the city.
Anonymous wrote:The joke among all the other schools is that Wilson is not diverse it is divided. There's a white Wilson and black Wilson and everyone is idiots if they don't think it is happening...it is a plain as the nose on your face.
Anonymous wrote:The joke among all the other schools is that Wilson is not diverse it is divided. There's a white Wilson and black Wilson and everyone is idiots if they don't think it is happening...it is a plain as the nose on your face.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't a school head have the authority to make changes on the senior school leadership team? That's daft.
to preserve the LGBT mafia, why else?
Better an LGBT cabal than a pedophile ring. No one has proved the latter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't a school head have the authority to make changes on the senior school leadership team? That's daft.
to preserve the LGBT mafia, why else?
Anonymous wrote:20:12 -- you replied to my post on firing principals. YOU ARE CORRECT!! In re-reading, it is the administrators where the buck stops, isn't it. As for their neglect of the 3:30 to 6 pm "critical hours", this is one area that if they put their money where their mouths were starting with Rhee's first year on board, the kids struggling in high school could have very well been much better prepared. No new principal will be able to close that gap!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn't a school head have the authority to make changes on the senior school leadership team? That's daft.
to preserve the LGBT mafia, why else?

Anonymous wrote:PP again -- just think -- if they really did move on their campaign talk about those critical 3:30 to 6 hours, these kids would be entering high school about now much better prepared -- and I'm talking about the multiple primary and middle schools that surely have had neglectful after care programming.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with 17:38 -- let's back track to middle school, please. Fire the principal who graduates an 8th grader into HS who is not prepared. Back track further, fire the Primary grades principal who graduated the children to 6th. On another vein, let's backtrack to the empty valor of Rhee/Kaya when they stormed into town --They talked and talked about cutting the "fat" from DCPS central and putting $$$ into one of the only viable solutions to improve the achievement gap -- "wraparound services". Oh, yeah. Our pal Rhee and her deputy Kaya were going to ensure those critical hours between 3:30 and 6 were catching up the kids who do not have financial advantages at home, and it was going to be even across town. Hmmm….At Oyster-Adams Rhee's buddy Monica Aguirre (wife of former DPR head Jesus who magically has made it to Superintendent of State for DC) allowed a 2-tier after care program to run for years, one that sucked and was free and one that didn't suck that certain parts of the Oyster population could afford. Hmmm. How are the after care programs in all wards these days? There's the critical hours, folks. 3:30 to 6, primary school, and DCPS central must have just made up all that when they rode in on their horses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How could DPCS think a new principal can close the gap when they can't even figure it out themselves.......
I think an important thing to look at is where the students are when they come in and where they are when they leave- do they improve at Wilson?
I do think there is a big push for students of all levels to take AP classes- think of the ridiculous Jay Matthews rankings.
Despite what
The gap was already closing under Cahall -- but apparently DCPS thinks someone else can close it even faster? How's a new principal supposed to do that?
I don't think the gap was closing under Cahall -- but the actual facts can be shown by someone with the real numbers -- that's what we need, without any manipulating or misrepresentation.
As for students improving once they got to Wilson, why would they? and why would this be a reflection on the principal or the teachers at Wilson and not on past schools and the kids and the parents themselves?
Not to say the parents are doing something "wrong" but if they can't provide the type of enrichment (educational travel, 2nd language, tutors, music lessons) that some kids get at home, their kids' scores are not going to be as high. It is a fact that college board scores reflect SES. Why wouldn't hs scores? Why would a hs principal be expected to change this?
So we give up on trying to figure out how to make greater gains in closing the achievement gap? Look I think we all know that the reasons for the achievement gap are complicated and extend far beyond what parents do. I've read that even when you compare scores of white students of high SES with black/Latino students of similar economic backgrounds, the gap still exists and persists.
I think it is an important issue for the Wilson community and the new prinicipal to work on. The challenge is making sure the next principal is set up for success.
Who said "give up?" What if part of the answer is that high school is too late to try to close the gap? should we still have the principal and the wilson community "work on it" and then be punished if they "fail."
For instance, let's say a new goal was to increase 2nd language fluency, and ALL the evidence shows that the earlier you start the better and best of all is learning it first at home as a toddler from an educated native speaker. Would we punish hs principals for not bringing 2nd language fluency up to native levels?
What if the principal increased the number of students studying a 2nd language in hs, but still the fluency levels didn't go up -- is it the principal's fault?
What if there happens to be a large number of native speakers of a certain language at the school and they ace the AP courses in that language -- does the principal get the credit?