Anonymous wrote:My opinion on this is divorce.
Reason being is because if the children see both parents stay in a marital union where both parties are miserable, whether there is actual fighting going on or not, they will for sure sense some marital discord within the home environment and thus grow up believing this is completely normal...That this is what a typical and normal marriage is all about.
It will be a horrible example for how they will model their future relationships on and a vicious cycle may continue on and on....
Also, an unhappy parent = an unhappy child ultimately.
Parents must understand that children are a lot smarter than they think, and that they have excellent instincts. It is almost impossible to hide the fact from your child on a daily basis that you are living a lie and simply enduring each day, not celebrating it.
I am not saying divorce and broken families is a walk in the park. Divorce can be brutal on children as well.
But when you compare both situations overall, staying in a bad marriage is more toxic for the children growing up and has the worst lasting effect on them as they become adults.
Anonymous wrote:A dud marriage where you don't feel connected or in love, but otherwise can be considerate to one another is better for kids than divorce. But if there is any friction, like regular fighting or worse, divorce generally is better.
Anonymous wrote:My opinion on this is divorce.
Reason being is because if the children see both parents stay in a marital union where both parties are miserable, whether there is actual fighting going on or not, they will for sure sense some marital discord within the home environment and thus grow up believing this is completely normal...That this is what a typical and normal marriage is all about.
It will be a horrible example for how they will model their future relationships on and a vicious cycle may continue on and on....
Also, an unhappy parent = an unhappy child ultimately.
Parents must understand that children are a lot smarter than they think, and that they have excellent instincts. It is almost impossible to hide the fact from your child on a daily basis that you are living a lie and simply enduring each day, not celebrating it.
I am not saying divorce and broken families is a walk in the park. Divorce can be brutal on children as well.
But when you compare both situations overall, staying in a bad marriage is more toxic for the children growing up and has the worst lasting effect on them as they become adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every day you vow not to subject them to your fighting?
Why don't you just stop arguing, period?
NP, but this is hard. We seem to operate on two separate sets of experiences. His growing up vs. my growing up. What he remembers of of his time with DD vs. what I remember. We don't have the same experiences at all. Our reactions, our parenting is totally different. So, little things become fights in front of DD, because we each challenge the way the other reacts to DD at every turn. Every moment. Every nap.
Of course it's hard, but so what?! LIFE is hard. You don't get to opt out of things simply because they are "hard." (What kind of terrible example is THAT to set for your kids?
You have written an excellent description here of the dynamic that goes on between many, many, many (most if not all) couples when they first have kids. You are bringing to your parenting all of the baggage of your own growing up experiences -- that's what you know, good or bad and the familiar seems what is right. Anything else is "wrong." This affects issues from the reasonable to the ridiculous ("what do you mean, Santa wraps gifts?? No he does NOT! In my house growing up, Santa did not wrap his gifts and that's the way it should be for our kids!") The real problem is that you are letting everything turn into a power play because --- out of deep insecurity -- you both desperately need to be proved "right."
The best solution DH and I found was to simply split up the tasks. He got to make some decisions and I supported them, whether I agreed or not. Same with me and what I got to decide on. The important thing is to present a united front to your kids. Make a list of everything you are arguing over now -- baths, naps, eating, clothes she's wearing, whether or not to cry it out, etc etc. There will be many now, and the list will constantly change as she grows up. Then be honest -- which things are really important to you, and which are more important to DH? My kids are older, but to me, what is important is that they say please/ thank you, wear what I consider to be appropriate clothing, that they write thank you notes, that they have some religious training and that they eat a nutritious diet. DH cares more about structured time for schoolwork, how sports and extra curricular activities are determined, etc. You get the picture. He makes his decisions and I make mine but then we agree to SUPPORT, not criticize each other, even when a decision turns out to be the wrong one.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with previous posters. Read Unexpected Legacy of Divorce - it is eye-opening and concludes that children that grow up in unhappy marriages are better off in the long-run than this whose parents divorced. I come from divorce and work in early childhood and divorces are ENORMOUSLY damaging to children. IMHO divorce is far more damaging than a bad marriage, although a bad marriage is no picnic for kids either. Best advice is to try harder - and surrender some key ground to your s/o in order to show him the way to surrendering ground. You re not losing - just paving the way and setting a good example of what kind of relationship you want to have with him. He is human and doing the best he can - and frankly - you may be wrong about some things you are fighting about. Let it go - love him - talk to him - and compromise. Your children will be MUCH MUCH better for it.
Egm80 wrote:If you are interested in data and not just anecdotes, there is a book on this called "The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce" that followed children of divorce (and the divorcees) after 25 years. It is worth a read.
What does it say