Anonymous wrote:Just read again and noticed the people they brought with them included their own sibling and your husband's brother and his wife. So your offer to stay in your guest room would have deprived them of their other child's company over the holiday, and that of their sister.
They spent over $10K in hotels and more in airfare!!! Do you know how much money you would have saved them if you had just visited them at their house? Crikey!!!
Anonymous wrote:Just read again and noticed the people they brought with them included their own sibling and your husband's brother and his wife. So your offer to stay in your guest room would have deprived them of their other child's company over the holiday, and that of their sister.
They spent over $10K in hotels and more in airfare!!! Do you know how much money you would have saved them if you had just visited them at their house? Crikey!!!
Anonymous wrote:OP Here - I have certainly received my comeuppance here today, which is fine. The dinner was more of a "wouldn't it just be more convenient for the foreign cousins (with 4 kids) - and our kids - if it was at a house instead of a restaurant" and me saying "I guess I can make it work so long as I don't have to cook for 15 people on the day after XMAS" as opposed to a big invitation. But no matter. Honest question, though, isn't it unusual for my in laws to invite other family members to our Christmas celebration anyway? I mean I would never visit them and inform them I was bringing extra people. I feel like it's akin to her inviting us to have Thankgiving with them, and me announcing that I would also be bringing my parents, my sister, and six friends, and then expecting her to either cook or coordinate dinner for 8 nights for people she barely knows. Or am I wrong about this too? Does accepting monetary help during my husband's unemployment (during which no one wanted my DH to have to go out of his way to actually care for the kids - hence the help with childcare) mean I am now the personal caterer for their extended family gatherings?
Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry- are the 'foreign cousins' not really cousins or something? I'm not understanding this descriptor or why it matters
Anonymous wrote:Except you aren't the personal caterer. They offered to take everyone out for dinner but you declined. Did it ever occur to you that they had planned to see all these people for Christmas but since you guys refused to travel they changed plans? Your in laws sound like great people. It's a shame they have a son and daughter in law like you two. You're unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:OP Here - I have certainly received my comeuppance here today, which is fine. The dinner was more of a "wouldn't it just be more convenient for the foreign cousins (with 4 kids) - and our kids - if it was at a house instead of a restaurant" and me saying "I guess I can make it work so long as I don't have to cook for 15 people on the day after XMAS" as opposed to a big invitation. But no matter. Honest question, though, isn't it unusual for my in laws to invite other family members to our Christmas celebration anyway? I mean I would never visit them and inform them I was bringing extra people. I feel like it's akin to her inviting us to have Thankgiving with them, and me announcing that I would also be bringing my parents, my sister, and six friends, and then expecting her to either cook or coordinate dinner for 8 nights for people she barely knows. Or am I wrong about this too? Does accepting monetary help during my husband's unemployment (during which no one wanted my DH to have to go out of his way to actually care for the kids - hence the help with childcare) mean I am now the personal caterer for their extended family gatherings?
Anonymous wrote:You offered to host, after MIL said she'd pay for a restaurant. Yes, you are crazy to think she would have reimbursed you.