Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents of one hover and then they hover any minimal grandkids they have too. And they always fight to have their one and only at every holiday and event in their lives. And then they hover over you because you are their never-had daughter. I married an only and it SUCKS! I came from a family of 4 and it is just so much different.
Apparently you didn't learn critical thinking skills in your family of origin. How unfortunate for you.
Not the PP but this makes no sense whatsoever. Are you saying they should use their critical thinking to tell their in-laws to not be around? To spend Christmas alone. I am married to an only child myself and this is a huge issue. Spoiling my 2 kids so over the top because they are the only grandkids. Telling me how to raise them, offended if we don't invite them to every little play, musical, soccer game etc... Not understanding that I have my family and want to see them without them 2 tagging along sometimes. It is a slippery slope. If there was just one more sibling with or without another grandkid would give my husband and I some breathing room. And the part about them aging (someone else mentioned) scares me a lot. It is a lot to take with no help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents of one hover and then they hover any minimal grandkids they have too. And they always fight to have their one and only at every holiday and event in their lives. And then they hover over you because you are their never-had daughter. I married an only and it SUCKS! I came from a family of 4 and it is just so much different.
Apparently you didn't learn critical thinking skills in your family of origin. How unfortunate for you.
Not the PP but this makes no sense whatsoever. Are you saying they should use their critical thinking to tell their in-laws to not be around? To spend Christmas alone. I am married to an only child myself and this is a huge issue. Spoiling my 2 kids so over the top because they are the only grandkids. Telling me how to raise them, offended if we don't invite them to every little play, musical, soccer game etc... Not understanding that I have my family and want to see them without them 2 tagging along sometimes. It is a slippery slope. If there was just one more sibling with or without another grandkid would give my husband and I some breathing room. And the part about them aging (someone else mentioned) scares me a lot. It is a lot to take with no help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an only myself, the reason I would never choose to have an only is not the childhood period (when as others have said, I learned to relate well to adults, enjoyed a great relationship with parents, and developed very strong relationships with friends and their families, and vice versa, to "fill in " for no siblings). The issue is instead what happens when you become an adult and deal with aging parents. Being the only outlet and support for them is difficult, both practically and simply in terms of having another person (besides spouse) to talk to about decisions. It can be a lot to put onto a single person, and then when parents die, no family left other than your own kids. Just something else to think about. It definitely induced me to have two children, and we are lucky because now as young adults they are best friends and supports for each other.
My husband is the middle child of three. His father died suddenly and DH handled all the death and after death arrangements. Several years later when his mother was diagnosed with a terminal and debilitating disease, DH cared for his mother with no support from either sibling. He says he was always grateful that his mother was kind and thus had good girlfriends because they helped him a plenty. Btw, when his mom died, his siblings were there for the funeral and the reading of the will. I still despise his sister to this day, and have no contact with her. There is no guarantee that siblings will be there for each other when you age.
I too am from a family of three children, and we did work together when my mom became seriously ill. So, I guess your chances are 50/50.
You think from your personal experience that having siblings (2, 3, 4 or more) have a 50% chance of having no contact with them in adulthood and doing 100% everything for your parents while the other siblings do nothing? Really now. What a stupid generalization. Siblings are extremely important and I don't know any friends, cousins and my own spouse, and siblings who don't keep contact with their siblings. So could I say it is 100% chance? No but I know the number is on the smaller side and no where near 50%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parents of one hover and then they hover any minimal grandkids they have too. And they always fight to have their one and only at every holiday and event in their lives. And then they hover over you because you are their never-had daughter. I married an only and it SUCKS! I came from a family of 4 and it is just so much different.
Apparently you didn't learn critical thinking skills in your family of origin. How unfortunate for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As an only myself, the reason I would never choose to have an only is not the childhood period (when as others have said, I learned to relate well to adults, enjoyed a great relationship with parents, and developed very strong relationships with friends and their families, and vice versa, to "fill in " for no siblings). The issue is instead what happens when you become an adult and deal with aging parents. Being the only outlet and support for them is difficult, both practically and simply in terms of having another person (besides spouse) to talk to about decisions. It can be a lot to put onto a single person, and then when parents die, no family left other than your own kids. Just something else to think about. It definitely induced me to have two children, and we are lucky because now as young adults they are best friends and supports for each other.
My husband is the middle child of three. His father died suddenly and DH handled all the death and after death arrangements. Several years later when his mother was diagnosed with a terminal and debilitating disease, DH cared for his mother with no support from either sibling. He says he was always grateful that his mother was kind and thus had good girlfriends because they helped him a plenty. Btw, when his mom died, his siblings were there for the funeral and the reading of the will. I still despise his sister to this day, and have no contact with her. There is no guarantee that siblings will be there for each other when you age.
I too am from a family of three children, and we did work together when my mom became seriously ill. So, I guess your chances are 50/50.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the same as you, I got a dog with the original intention of only having one, but after a couple weeks (which is basically a year in dog years) I felt she needed a playmate so I got another. This is probably what will happen to you.
It's really unfair to keep an only child be themselves like that.
Yeah because your dog is equal to a kid. Come back when you have to clothe, educate, and put braces on their teeth.
Anonymous wrote:I was the same as you, I got a dog with the original intention of only having one, but after a couple weeks (which is basically a year in dog years) I felt she needed a playmate so I got another. This is probably what will happen to you.
It's really unfair to keep an only child be themselves like that.
Anonymous wrote:As an only myself, the reason I would never choose to have an only is not the childhood period (when as others have said, I learned to relate well to adults, enjoyed a great relationship with parents, and developed very strong relationships with friends and their families, and vice versa, to "fill in " for no siblings). The issue is instead what happens when you become an adult and deal with aging parents. Being the only outlet and support for them is difficult, both practically and simply in terms of having another person (besides spouse) to talk to about decisions. It can be a lot to put onto a single person, and then when parents die, no family left other than your own kids. Just something else to think about. It definitely induced me to have two children, and we are lucky because now as young adults they are best friends and supports for each other.
Anonymous wrote:Parents of one hover and then they hover any minimal grandkids they have too. And they always fight to have their one and only at every holiday and event in their lives. And then they hover over you because you are their never-had daughter. I married an only and it SUCKS! I came from a family of 4 and it is just so much different.
Anonymous wrote:I was an only and my relationship with my single mother was much closer than any of my friends had. A mother with more than one child will certainly love them the same but there are only 24 hours in a day. All of my mother's free time was mine.
DH and I also have an Only who is now 14. Aside from the fact that we have been able to afford private school for her, we have been able to travel extensively with her. We are both very close to our daughter, who has lots of friends and activities. I've never had siblings or multiple children so I cannot compare but I loved being and only and having an only.