Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Live in a safe neighborhood
Aren't the safe (i.e low street crime, higher SES) neighborhoods those are most often targeted by burglars. We live in one of those and I hear about burglaries quite often.
Anonymous wrote:I live in Bethesda, Bradley Hills area. Last week cops were all over my neighbors house who had been robbed. Turns out transients from another state had been stalking the neighborhood for weeks to observe routines. They got about 15 homes. Who did they not hit? Myself and any neighbor with a dog, according to police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dogs, dogs, dogs.
Dogs are trivially easy to disable.
You don't need the dogs to attack the burglars or otherwise prevent the burglary. You need the dogs to make the burglars decide to go to the next house, which doesn't have dogs, instead.
This is a really important point.
Thanks, quoted PP here. That's what MCPD told us after we had a break-in at our last house while we (and the dogs) were on vacation many years ago. I've always had dogs because I love them, and no one should have dogs just for protection IMO, but they are a deterrent. The best deterrent is NRA membership stickers on your front door, but we're not going to go that far.
RE: the PP who asked about guns, this was a decade-long debate between my husband and me that I eventually lost. Our solution was to have a licensed, registered gun, stored loaded but locked in a combination safe bolted to a heavy piece of furniture with a combination only he knows, after he took a multiple days-long gun safety course.
Do not stick an NRA sticker on your house. That tells a thief "I have stuff worth stealing inside."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dogs, dogs, dogs.
Dogs are trivially easy to disable.
You don't need the dogs to attack the burglars or otherwise prevent the burglary. You need the dogs to make the burglars decide to go to the next house, which doesn't have dogs, instead.
This is a really important point.
Thanks, quoted PP here. That's what MCPD told us after we had a break-in at our last house while we (and the dogs) were on vacation many years ago. I've always had dogs because I love them, and no one should have dogs just for protection IMO, but they are a deterrent. The best deterrent is NRA membership stickers on your front door, but we're not going to go that far.
RE: the PP who asked about guns, this was a decade-long debate between my husband and me that I eventually lost. Our solution was to have a licensed, registered gun, stored loaded but locked in a combination safe bolted to a heavy piece of furniture with a combination only he knows, after he took a multiple days-long gun safety course.
Anonymous wrote:Dogs, dogs, dogs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dogs, dogs, dogs.
Dogs are trivially easy to disable.
You don't need the dogs to attack the burglars or otherwise prevent the burglary. You need the dogs to make the burglars decide to go to the next house, which doesn't have dogs, instead.
This is a really important point.
Anonymous wrote:We live in a very safe neighborhood.
We have two big-ass German Shepherds. The sound of their bark is enough to deter an intruder. And they absolutely would attack if someone broke into our home.
I also have a gun.
I sleep very well at night.
Anonymous wrote:Ha sometimes I miss living in Argentina. Houses in our safe neighborhood were designed like fortresses and were basically robber proof. Unless someone followed you in, there was no way they could get in. Unfortunately we learned that the hard way when we left our keys inside and shut the front door which locks automatically. Not even the landlord has copies of keys. Just the way many houses are designed in that city.
I've never felt so safe and at times we had up to 15,000 pesos in the house!
Anonymous wrote:Live in a safe neighborhood
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dogs, dogs, dogs.
Dogs are trivially easy to disable.
You don't need the dogs to attack the burglars or otherwise prevent the burglary. You need the dogs to make the burglars decide to go to the next house, which doesn't have dogs, instead.