Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks doing laundry for myself and eight kids would make SENSE at a laundromat?
If I did it at my house with my one washer and one dryer, it would take days. Load a couple of the big industrial sized laundromat machines up and be done in a couple of hours.
Even if I DID have the machines, with eight kids I'd probably find it simpler to just do one (really) big run to the laundromat once or twice a week.
Good point.
But the issue of the children/laundromat is still irrelevant. Parents died -- died! -- along with their kids, pulverized by an out-of-control driver, and the reaction of some is to create a bogus scale on which to judge whether they are worthy of empathy. That is cold.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/after-md-crash-killing-5-families-must-determine-care-for-10-kids-who-lost-moms/2014/10/14/c6fad55e-53b7-11e4-892e-602188e70e9c_story.html
The one woman had 8 kids.
And no, they are not orphans unless their father(s )are also dead. The article doesn't mention anything about them.
Actually it does:
“She was just doing her motherly duties,” said Anthony Hardy, 22, Curtis’s stepson. “She did everything a mother was supposed to do. She put her children before everyone.”
...
"Hardy said his father will take care of Curtis’s two oldest children, Hardy’s half brother and half sister. The family is still making arrangements for the others. Fundraising Web sites have been set up for the family, both to pay for burials and the care of the children who have lost their mothers."
So the father of the step-child will take care of the next two oldest children. The family is still trying to make arrangements for the other children, which sounds as if the other father(s) are not in the picture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks doing laundry for myself and eight kids would make SENSE at a laundromat?
If I did it at my house with my one washer and one dryer, it would take days. Load a couple of the big industrial sized laundromat machines up and be done in a couple of hours.
Even if I DID have the machines, with eight kids I'd probably find it simpler to just do one (really) big run to the laundromat once or twice a week.
Good point.
But the issue of the children/laundromat is still irrelevant. Parents died -- died! -- along with their kids, pulverized by an out-of-control driver, and the reaction of some is to create a bogus scale on which to judge whether they are worthy of empathy. That is cold.
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks doing laundry for myself and eight kids would make SENSE at a laundromat?
If I did it at my house with my one washer and one dryer, it would take days. Load a couple of the big industrial sized laundromat machines up and be done in a couple of hours.
Even if I DID have the machines, with eight kids I'd probably find it simpler to just do one (really) big run to the laundromat once or twice a week.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a fund set up or anything? This is tragic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ten children being left motherless is a tragedy, pure and simple. I don't see how anyone could think otherwise.
Who said it isn't?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The story says the mom was going to the laundromat. You can't afford to raise 8 kids by 35 yrs if you can't afford a place without a washer dryer in the unit or building. Incredibly irresponsible to just have kids like that.
Because that's the story -- what a bad mother she was, to have children even though she didn't have a washing machine and dryer in the building? Really?
Yes, really. It's not just the w/d. If you have to go to the laundromat every weekend it probably means you don't have much disposable income. After I had a child I realized how much money it takes to provide quality care for her and be in a not so bad school district, and provide optional things like extracurricular activities.
Bringing home the baby from the hospital you start with a car seat, crib. If you work, quality daycare (some of those lower end in home daycares made me really uncomfirtable but even those were 800/month). Even if the child has no crib they need some space to sleep. Fresh food, even cheap target diapers are 15 cents apiece, activities, roach free home, safer neighborhood, the list just goes on. I was a SAHM once and I know how hard it is just to spend a lot of quality time with 1 or 2 kids. Just the time you spend trying to feed them and bathe them and do those types of survival things takes hours with babies and toddlers. Older children will have their own needs and need your attention and sometimes need to be dropped off and picked up etc. 8? Come on. Do you think all this mom needs is love to care for these children? You are kidding yourself if this single mom's kids were not shortchanged in many different ways, also with tangible and intangible things.
Anonymous wrote:Ten children being left motherless is a tragedy, pure and simple. I don't see how anyone could think otherwise.