Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a woman Id take a woman with a job over a man without a job.......
+1!
We don't want no scrubs.
Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Anonymous wrote:The article should be no surprise to anyone.
Women tend to be inflexible when it comes to a man's status and career. Men are more inflexible about physical health and youth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so sick of this garbage. Women are FINALLY gaining parity in this world, and now men are complaining. Too bad. White men are now getting their chance to experience what women and non-whites have experienced for 99.99% of human history - the absence of preferential treatment.
Here's my advice to men - go to school, study hard, work hard, get ahead. As a woman, it's what I had to do. No one handed me anything, and no one is going to hand you anything either. You'll have to succeed or fail on your own merits like everyone else.
I don't follow. How is it parity for women or preferential treatment for men if women are much less willing to marry a man based on his status as not employed?
The point is that there's a whole movement of white men bitching and whining about how they are so put upon these days when in reality, they are just waking up to the realization that they will now have to get an education, a job and a mate based on their own merits and that women are not going to fall at their feet because they have no better options. We have all the options we want now, and we don't have to settle for you. Deal with it.
I come from a long line of white men, am surrounded by white men, and know dozens and dozens of white men and I've never heard of this movement, nor heard of them bitch about how they are put upon. Sounds like a bunch of nonsense to me.
The internet is full of these losers and their apologists.
Anonymous wrote:Who want's anyone - male or female - without a job?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
You both may want to hold off on having children. There are way too many red flags with your husband.
Really after the youngest is in K .. If your H says he fully supports you not having a job all day long and you believe it... you are living a lie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Your poor (future) child.
+1
I would never marry a man that had his type of attitude.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Your poor (future) child.
+1
I would never marry a man that had his type of attitude.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
You both may want to hold off on having children. There are way too many red flags with your husband.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Your poor (future) child.
Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Anonymous wrote:It's not something we say in polite conversation, but my DH is 100% NOT okay with women not working. He doesn't respect them. He has said numerous times that he wouldn't have married someone who didn't want to work.
Which is all well and fine because we both work and contribute and feel equal in our relationship, but this is why we don't have kids yet. I don't want to feel lesser because I'd have to take 12 weeks unpaid leave for a baby and he doesn't have to. It seems unfair, like I'm valued less
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so sick of this garbage. Women are FINALLY gaining parity in this world, and now men are complaining. Too bad. White men are now getting their chance to experience what women and non-whites have experienced for 99.99% of human history - the absence of preferential treatment.
Here's my advice to men - go to school, study hard, work hard, get ahead. As a woman, it's what I had to do. No one handed me anything, and no one is going to hand you anything either. You'll have to succeed or fail on your own merits like everyone else.
I don't follow. How is it parity for women or preferential treatment for men if women are much less willing to marry a man based on his status as not employed?
The point is that there's a whole movement of white men bitching and whining about how they are so put upon these days when in reality, they are just waking up to the realization that they will now have to get an education, a job and a mate based on their own merits and that women are not going to fall at their feet because they have no better options. We have all the options we want now, and we don't have to settle for you. Deal with it.
I come from a long line of white men, am surrounded by white men, and know dozens and dozens of white men and I've never heard of this movement, nor heard of them bitch about how they are put upon. Sounds like a bunch of nonsense to me.