Anonymous
Post 10/01/2014 08:18     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:You have to give warning or a performance improvement plan before firing someone.


Nope, only for government employees.

Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 22:25     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Sorry, OP. I'm calling troll on this one. You post this morning and then 2 hours later have an update that the guy was fired? Try a little harder next time.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 21:06     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
HR needs to tell DH what to do. HR knows the laws of your state. Could this man sue for wrongful termination?
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 21:05     Subject: Re:Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:Hope the next guy DH hires for this position is really good at what he does; this, or HR eventually realizes that DH fires people rather than actually managing them or resolving issues.


Exactly.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 21:01     Subject: Re:Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Hope the next guy DH hires for this position is really good at what he does; this, or HR eventually realizes that DH fires people rather than actually managing them or resolving issues.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 20:41     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:You have to give warning or a performance improvement plan before firing someone.

I think this line of thought is the reason people are surprised when they are fired for blogging bad things about their employer/boss. There is no law that says you have to be given a second chance.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 20:28     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:You have to give warning or a performance improvement plan before firing someone.

Nope. No you don't.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 20:24     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
You have to give warning or a performance improvement plan before firing someone.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 20:15     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
The guy is a future problem waiting to happen. Cut your losses now; fire him.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 19:02     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think this is between DH and HR.


+1. I would ensure that my wife didn't blab all of the information on a website.


Yup. Do you have a job, OP?



Very good point. And, yes, DH should punt to HR if there is an HR.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 18:51     Subject: Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:It's nice that "DH fired him" however I've never heard of the decision being up to the boss kwim, it's generally decided/decreed by HR/company legal. Normally not even the prez of our company would fire someone without going through HR. But that's great that he's gone -

HR supports the hiring/firing process but they don't make that decision unless it's for an HR employee. This is "at will" employment meaning the person can quit at any time and can be let go at any time except in the instance of discrimination which is not the case here. I've worked for companies where the president very willingly fired anyone he felt was not pulling his/her weight. He was crazy as a loon but he's allowed to do it.
Anonymous
Post 09/30/2014 17:18     Subject: Re:Creepy behavior problem at work - WWYD
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is OP.
Here's an update: DH fired him.

I don't know the whole story but I get the impression he received some more information that swayed his decision. I agree with the folks above who said this is none of my business. That's the truth. DH asked my advice because he was so torn about the incident. He was up a lot last night and I really feel his stress. This is a situation that occurred in another part of the country and I have no reason to think that a post on this anonymous board will cause problems.


It may not cause problems, but does it not seem unethical to you?


Np here. I don't see any identifying information in her post. What makes you think it's unethical?


Because it's an employee issue that HR discussed with the supervisor.


Why would it be a problem if there's no identifying information?


I think you don't understand what unethical means.


+ a million