Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I notice UPenn and Penn State students refer to their respective schools as 'Penn.' How do they differentiate the two without referring to location? I hear students say 'I'm heading to Penn.' Does one just ask which one?
Wrong. Penn State is Penn State. Both schools have strong identities for better (and worse) and the confusion factor isn't very high. If someone says they went to Penn, it can only mean the Philly Ivy school. No one at Penn calls it UPenn. And I've never heard anyone calls Penn State anything other than Penn State.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I notice UPenn and Penn State students refer to their respective schools as 'Penn.' How do they differentiate the two without referring to location? I hear students say 'I'm heading to Penn.' Does one just ask which one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about engineering without a business double major? What's the engineering program like? Hard to believe it is worth the price tag over a flagship state school. (And we have Penn people in our family.)
Access to choice firms/jobs is better and it is smaller than a state school so less kids fighting over resources.
And you don't 'close off avenues' - i.e. a state school engineering student who decides senior year he wants to become a consultant or trader or work at a tech-focused investment firm would be frozen out of the recruiting pipeline (or would have to really really work hard on their own to break in) whereas an engineering student at penn has these types of companies (along with your typical technology companies) flock onto campus.
It is better to go to a 'target school' than not.
Now certain programs like BME is stronger at places like jhu and duke.
I would say half of penn's engineering students do engineering but really want to work in quantitative finance, business strategy but tech focused, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about engineering without a business double major? What's the engineering program like? Hard to believe it is worth the price tag over a flagship state school. (And we have Penn people in our family.)
Access to choice firms/jobs is better and it is smaller than a state school so less kids fighting over resources.
And you don't 'close off avenues' - i.e. a state school engineering student who decides senior year he wants to become a consultant or trader or work at a tech-focused investment firm would be frozen out of the recruiting pipeline (or would have to really really work hard on their own to break in) whereas an engineering student at penn has these types of companies (along with your typical technology companies) flock onto campus.
It is better to go to a 'target school' than not.
Now certain programs like BME is stronger at places like jhu and duke.
I would say half of penn's engineering students do engineering but really want to work in quantitative finance, business strategy but tech focused, etc.
Anonymous wrote:What about engineering without a business double major? What's the engineering program like? Hard to believe it is worth the price tag over a flagship state school. (And we have Penn people in our family.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDhf9qwiA34
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Multiple Penn family connections. I'd let my kid go to Wharton undergrad but for absolutely nothing else.
Why do you say that? I'm a Wharton grad who is very pro-Wharton, but I'm not sure that I'd say my kid couldn't go there for anything else.
Anonymous wrote:LOL. Booz is definitely not on the radar for most Wharton grads.
Anonymous wrote:Multiple Penn family connections. I'd let my kid go to Wharton undergrad but for absolutely nothing else.