Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the people who dislike this system have kids that can't behave themselves. I have 3 kids ranging from 12 - 9 who all had this system and never had a yellow. They were all proud of staying on green all day and all week. If this system keeps some peace so my kids can learn more then I am all for it.
My child had this in k & first and he never had red or yellow, but he hated it because it stressed him out. Like he didn't know what was expected out of him. He was so worried about it even though he never had the "bad colors" as he called them. So I am not a fan of this system either, and my child still has yet to be in trouble at school and he's a third grader now. He's a very well behaved boy and always has been.
Having worked in an elementary school that used this system, I noticed that the ones who got reds and yellows were repeat offenders. It was the same kids EVERY DAY. So I don't think this worked as a way to help them manage their behavior either. So my overall opinion of this system is that it's not a very good one.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the people who dislike this system have kids that can't behave themselves. I have 3 kids ranging from 12 - 9 who all had this system and never had a yellow. They were all proud of staying on green all day and all week. If this system keeps some peace so my kids can learn more then I am all for it.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting that the people who dislike this system have kids that can't behave themselves. I have 3 kids ranging from 12 - 9 who all had this system and never had a yellow. They were all proud of staying on green all day and all week. If this system keeps some peace so my kids can learn more then I am all for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apologies to the OP for hijacking this thread, but I'm wondering about another tactic I'm seeing in my daughter's classroom:
The kids sit at assigned tables, and the teacher has a system where tables can earn or lose tickets depending on their behavior. (If one individual acts up, the whole table can lose tickets.) There's a reward for earning a certain number of tickers, and one kid at each table is the table captain and is supposed to remind the other kids about their behavior.
Now, I feel for this teacher -- she has 26 1st-graders to manage, and no paraprofessional to help her -- but I have mixed feelings about this arrangement.
(Also, when I see situations where the whole group is held accountable for one person's behavior, it always makes me think of the blanket party in Full Metal Jacket. Obviously, 1st grade is not Vietnam, but I worry that it doesn't bring out the best in kids -- that it can lead to bullying.)
I understand if you don't want to say, but is this Hunt Valley? My 1st grader reported the same thing.
I hope you're not a teacher. I am, and I cringe when I hear a younger teacher say, in response to my criticism of some ill thought out or poorly researched idea, what else am I supposed to do? Well, there is an enormous body of research available to answer just that question, and if the teacher bothered to ever pick up of any of it and practice her own reading skills, she'd know. Even just a quick Google would help keep teachers informed of the latest research on best practices, but most just never bother. In my last school you'd have been hard pressed to find a teacher who could actually support her behavior management practices with even piece of actual evidence (most don't even understand that just thinking it sounds good is not evidence).
Anonymous wrote:Just curious:
You don't like public shaming. I don't either. However, what would you have the teacher do? I prefer positive reinforcement, but with 26 kids that is very difficult.