Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just tell the all siblings collectively that the fact is simply that full time care is now needed and it will cost $x. Everyone votes either to approve outside care or to provide it themselves in exchange for that money - basically contracting themselves. All votes must be in by a certain day. If no one steps up, there's the result. If someone does step up, they will be compensated.
No. Just no. We're not talking about who's going to take care of the family dog, this is a human being who is still competent to make decisions regarding his own care.
Anonymous wrote:I don't even think this is a "voting" situation. Siblings don't get an equal vote--it's up to your dad and the sibling who is currently providing care.
Your dad deserves to be as comfortable and cared for as he can afford and as you are able/willing to provide. If you do this right, he gets to be in an assisted living facility that he ends up loving, and enjoys enough years/months of comfort that he dies peacefully when that last month's payment empties his bank account. No one should be counting in his money.
$3500/month is a steal for good assisted living. Are you sure it's good? Does it really provide 24/7 toileting help? My mom is in assisted living but she has to be able to toilet herself unless she is short term recovering from a brief illness. I'd check to be sure of exactly the help that comes without extra fees.
If it's possible to get a POA for your dad, do it now. I don't trust your sibling to have his best interests at heart. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Just tell the all siblings collectively that the fact is simply that full time care is now needed and it will cost $x. Everyone votes either to approve outside care or to provide it themselves in exchange for that money - basically contracting themselves. All votes must be in by a certain day. If no one steps up, there's the result. If someone does step up, they will be compensated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In a similar situation my grandfather was the one who opposed assisted living. He left a very promising career and moved his family back to his small town. My GM also had to downshift and ultimately take care of ILs. The other two siblings visit rarely, but no one was mad at them - it was my GF who made the choice and took the responsibility for his parents.
Suggest this scenario to your sibling. Let him move to DC and arrange the care.
PP, your GM was a saint. Unless she was from the same small town, she sacrificed a LOT.
Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for you, OP, that your sibling is being such a selfish ass. If sibling does not live anywhere near here and has no responsibility for the care of Dad, he does not get a vote.
My in-laws put up a fuss initially when they had to move from their house where they had lived for 50+ yrs to assisted living but now my mil says she wishes they had moved sooner. Do what's best for your father and ignore the greedy pest.