Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but absence of a home theater would be a deal-breaker for me.
Me too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, might be like a swimming pool.
Funny......but how?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but absence of a home theater would be a deal-breaker for me.
Me too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I saw one of these in a house recently. It was around 7 years old and SO dated now. Like the speakers and the screen, everything had changed so much. Even the couches looked older. I felt like it had dated the house way too much.
+1. I'd think it might increase value by, say, $5-10k (guesstimate), just because it means you'd have good wires in place to support a reno later on. But otherwise, people want what they want. I'm not going to want your stadium seating, or else I'm going to want a different configuration.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but absence of a home theater would be a deal-breaker for me.
Anonymous wrote:We had one at our old house and we enjoyed it. We lucked out and the new buyers loved it - or so they said. But it easily could have gone the other way. We were preparing to wipe the slate clean if buyers didn't want one.
And if we were buying, it'd only "add value" if it seemed up-to-date and in line with our taste. There are a lot of ugly ones out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not all, IMO.
I loathe home theaters. If I bought a house with one, I'd only be thinking about how much it would cost to tear it out and turn it into useable space.
We have a home theater but our house is 6br 6ba and 6000 SF. I don't think I need another room. Point is that most houses that have home theater rooms are already large.
Anonymous wrote:So I saw one of these in a house recently. It was around 7 years old and SO dated now. Like the speakers and the screen, everything had changed so much. Even the couches looked older. I felt like it had dated the house way too much.