Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Those of you who say it is necessary to accept as literal truth the divinity of Christ, the Resurrection, the Virgin Birth, etc, can you tell me what you call someone who does not believe those things, but accepts and follows the teachings of Christ?
The teaching of Christ is that nobody gets to the father except through him. Do you accept it? And why?
Different poster. I accept that, but from a more metaphysical viewpoint . No one can reach that perfect good unless they become Christ-Like. Jesus Christ was our perfect example of unconditional love, compassion, kindness and ultimately, sacrifice. God in human form. How many of us would die for someone who didn't even like us? Someone who was undeserving? How many could forgive the way Jesus did?
I believe in Jesus as the Christ. I believe he came to earth to show us the way to perfect love. That makes me a Christian. However, I believe there are many, many paths to that same end. To God - the loving source of all that is good.
Nope. Nice try . Just admit you don't believe Christs teaching that he is the only begotten son of God who is the truth , the way and the life and that no man gets to the father except THROUGH him.
Don't be afraid to call him a loonatic if you do not accept that. He respects you more than the"Luke warm" spinners and word twisters.
I say this as gently as possible - Your words do not sound very Christ-like. I am a Christian because I am a follower of Christ. My spirituality does not require that I dismiss the beliefs of the others simply because they believe differently than I.
I can honor the Christ in all people.
Anonymous wrote:Christ came to separate not unite. The power is in the cross and the blood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Those of you who say it is necessary to accept as literal truth the divinity of Christ, the Resurrection, the Virgin Birth, etc, can you tell me what you call someone who does not believe those things, but accepts and follows the teachings of Christ?
The teaching of Christ is that nobody gets to the father except through him. Do you accept it? And why?
Different poster. I accept that, but from a more metaphysical viewpoint . No one can reach that perfect good unless they become Christ-Like. Jesus Christ was our perfect example of unconditional love, compassion, kindness and ultimately, sacrifice. God in human form. How many of us would die for someone who didn't even like us? Someone who was undeserving? How many could forgive the way Jesus did?
I believe in Jesus as the Christ. I believe he came to earth to show us the way to perfect love. That makes me a Christian. However, I believe there are many, many paths to that same end. To God - the loving source of all that is good.
Nope. Nice try . Just admit you don't believe Christs teaching that he is the only begotten son of God who is the truth , the way and the life and that no man gets to the father except THROUGH him.
Don't be afraid to call him a loonatic if you do not accept that. He respects you more than the"Luke warm" spinners and word twisters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Those of you who say it is necessary to accept as literal truth the divinity of Christ, the Resurrection, the Virgin Birth, etc, can you tell me what you call someone who does not believe those things, but accepts and follows the teachings of Christ?
The teaching of Christ is that nobody gets to the father except through him. Do you accept it? And why?
Different poster. I accept that, but from a more metaphysical viewpoint . No one can reach that perfect good unless they become Christ-Like. Jesus Christ was our perfect example of unconditional love, compassion, kindness and ultimately, sacrifice. God in human form. How many of us would die for someone who didn't even like us? Someone who was undeserving? How many could forgive the way Jesus did?
I believe in Jesus as the Christ. I believe he came to earth to show us the way to perfect love. That makes me a Christian. However, I believe there are many, many paths to that same end. To God - the loving source of all that is good.
Nope. Nice try . Just admit you don't believe Christs teaching that he is the only begotten son of God who is the truth , the way and the life and that no man gets to the father except THROUGH him.
Don't be afraid to call him a loonatic if you do not accept that. He respects you more than the"Luke warm" spinners and word twisters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.
Some of Jesus' teaching were excellent. Why is it so important to believe he also rose from the dead?
Because that is what Christianity is. You don't have to be Christian, if you don't want. You can just appreciate Jesus' teachings, if that's your thing.
So you wouldn't approve of a person calling themselves Christian if they lived by Jesus' teachings but did not believe that he rose from the dead?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Those of you who say it is necessary to accept as literal truth the divinity of Christ, the Resurrection, the Virgin Birth, etc, can you tell me what you call someone who does not believe those things, but accepts and follows the teachings of Christ?
The teaching of Christ is that nobody gets to the father except through him. Do you accept it? And why?
Different poster. I accept that, but from a more metaphysical viewpoint . No one can reach that perfect good unless they become Christ-Like. Jesus Christ was our perfect example of unconditional love, compassion, kindness and ultimately, sacrifice. God in human form. How many of us would die for someone who didn't even like us? Someone who was undeserving? How many could forgive the way Jesus did?
I believe in Jesus as the Christ. I believe he came to earth to show us the way to perfect love. That makes me a Christian. However, I believe there are many, many paths to that same end. To God - the loving source of all that is good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.
Some of Jesus' teaching were excellent. Why is it so important to believe he also rose from the dead?
Because that is what Christianity is. You don't have to be Christian, if you don't want. You can just appreciate Jesus' teachings, if that's your thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.
Some of Jesus' teaching were excellent. Why is it so important to believe he also rose from the dead?
Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.
some Christians would disagree with that, saying the teachings of Jesus are enough to support Christianity, without the need to tack on miracle stories borrowed from earlier religions.
takoma wrote:Those of you who say it is necessary to accept as literal truth the divinity of Christ, the Resurrection, the Virgin Birth, etc, can you tell me what you call someone who does not believe those things, but accepts and follows the teachings of Christ?
Anonymous wrote:If you do not believe that Jesus rose from the dead, there is no reason for Christianity.