Anonymous wrote:If a child failed to pass the first time around, what makes you think repeating the grade - and method of instruction - again would yield different results? If a child isn't able to learn it the first time, they need to be evaluated for LDs and, if qualified, get an IEP. Not addressing learning issues early harms everyone. I've got 2 kids in FCPS and I've seen all too often how willing the school system is to pass the kid to the next level. If we hadn't agitated so much and paid for tutoring, our kids would have been in high school but only capable of elementary level work. Yes, it's expensive to target the elementary kids but not as expensive as it is for high school students and the societal cost when they're adults but not adequately educated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Is this because of "no child left behind?"
I am the teacher who posted this. It is mostly because our principal makes the final call and can only hold back a certain number of students. It is ridiculous and chances are, the same thing will happen the following year.
And this is why I had high school students that were reading at the 4th grade level and did not know how to use a ruler. So sad.
I have one reading between a K and 1st grade level.
high school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Is this because of "no child left behind?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Is this because of "no child left behind?"
I am the teacher who posted this. It is mostly because our principal makes the final call and can only hold back a certain number of students. It is ridiculous and chances are, the same thing will happen the following year.
And this is why I had high school students that were reading at the 4th grade level and did not know how to use a ruler. So sad.
I have one reading between a K and 1st grade level.
high school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Is this because of "no child left behind?"
I am the teacher who posted this. It is mostly because our principal makes the final call and can only hold back a certain number of students. It is ridiculous and chances are, the same thing will happen the following year.
And this is why I had high school students that were reading at the 4th grade level and did not know how to use a ruler. So sad.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Anonymous wrote:What happens when a child is held back a year?
Alas, data on kids of equally poor academic standing shows that retaining that student is WORSE than promoting forward. And, of course, promoting forward without supports is WORSE than providing supports.
Anonymous wrote:When my oldest was in ES, we were told the kids got "weighted" grades. I don't know what that means, but as a practical matter, my son got Bs in Reading when he was completely unable to read. In MS, grades were no longer weighted and there were definitely some failing grades. Same in HS. Thing is, high school is more like college in that you have to take a bunch of classes - some defined, some out of a selection in a subject matter and some electives. If a class has a prerequisite, you have to take the prerequisite first. But, if not, you can take the classes in any order you want. So, if you fail some classes, you just pick them up later instead of repeating a grade. But, if you fail, the class doesn't count.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a teacher and I've have kids who have failed every subject. You would think that would make them automatically fail the grade and have to repeat it. You would be wrong. Some of those kids will not be retained and will move on to the next grade against his/her teachers' objections.
Is this because of "no child left behind?"
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()