Anonymous wrote:The houses are great but the majority of the neighborhood is a serious hike to metro. If u have a car it's an easy drive to Cleveland park. Bancroft still sucks and the white folks bail ASAP after kindergarten. The hordes of drunk Latinos peeing on the sidewalk is a bit much. The commercial strip is ok. But that new apt building beig reconstructed is going to bring another couple hundred low income Latinos back. It's very frustrating that a neighborhood of almost 1 million dollar homes doesn't get u a good school order than a bunch of pupiserias. I'm in Petworth which has its own issue but easy walk to metro very little low income housing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mt Pleasant has changed a lot over the last few years. There are lots of new restaurants, a coffee shop, and a lot of new families with young kids moving in. There is talk of zoning changes so the entire neighborhood will feed to Bancroft, deal, and Wilson. It remains one of the few places in the city that you can live in a reasonable 3 bedroom townhouse with little crime and also walk to work in 20 minutes. I expect prices will continue to rise, although perhaps more gradually.
Not really. There are a few new restaurants and most of them aren't good. Bancroft is just as bad as it's ever been. Obviously Mt. P. can get kicked out of Deal and Wilson and sent to Columbia Heights or Cardozo at some point. Very risky place to drop over $750K on a rowhouse, particularly if federal jobs dry up.
Here we are with the $&%% hip restaurants again. Both of you.
Which neighborhood has the best proximity not to hot "mixologists" but to rec centers, spray parks, soccer fields, safe places for new little bike riders to ride without cars, after school piano lessons and a walkable swimming pool with an option for summer swim team?
PP #1 Mt pleasant (not really) or eckington-truxton-shaw-NoMa-CH (26 year old childless poster #2)?
Every parent likes dining out sometimes or all the time but no actual parent with kids out of the Moby wrap chooses a home because it is steps from a scene. Pps like #2 should stick with PoP comment section instead of parenting site.
This will be news to all those people with kids I see walking around Capitol Hill. Not all parents are like you, no matter how forcefully you assert it. There are people with kids who live in all parts of the city who enjoy living near urban amenities and don't care about splash parks. None of the things you mention are unique to a city. You sound like you really want suburban living with a good commute, which is fine. But not every parent wants suburban living.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The houses are great but the majority of the neighborhood is a serious hike to metro. If u have a car it's an easy drive to Cleveland park. Bancroft still sucks and the white folks bail ASAP after kindergarten. The hordes of drunk Latinos peeing on the sidewalk is a bit much. The commercial strip is ok. But that new apt building beig reconstructed is going to bring another couple hundred low income Latinos back. It's very frustrating that a neighborhood of almost 1 million dollar homes doesn't get u a good school order than a bunch of pupiserias. I'm in Petworth which has its own issue but easy walk to metro very little low income housing.
I actually think the area near the Petworth metro will be a really good neighborhood very soon. It's clots to Metro and now a nice grocery, it doesn't have the public housing of Columbia Heights and the only thing that's really nearby is Park Morton complex and that is on the way to being closed. Add this to a really burgeoning retail and restaurant scene and walking distance to 11th St.
The last two pieces to the puzzle are the school (Powell) and the streetcar up Georgia Ave. The school is improving at a decent clip, but the jury is still out on whether it will improve to the point that gentrifiers will let their kids go there after kindergarten. And if that streetcar gets built (a big if), the place will explode with development. H street with a Metro stop.
And all for about 300K less that Mt. Pleasant.
Anonymous wrote:The houses are great but the majority of the neighborhood is a serious hike to metro. If u have a car it's an easy drive to Cleveland park. Bancroft still sucks and the white folks bail ASAP after kindergarten. The hordes of drunk Latinos peeing on the sidewalk is a bit much. The commercial strip is ok. But that new apt building beig reconstructed is going to bring another couple hundred low income Latinos back. It's very frustrating that a neighborhood of almost 1 million dollar homes doesn't get u a good school order than a bunch of pupiserias. I'm in Petworth which has its own issue but easy walk to metro very little low income housing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mt Pleasant has changed a lot over the last few years. There are lots of new restaurants, a coffee shop, and a lot of new families with young kids moving in. There is talk of zoning changes so the entire neighborhood will feed to Bancroft, deal, and Wilson. It remains one of the few places in the city that you can live in a reasonable 3 bedroom townhouse with little crime and also walk to work in 20 minutes. I expect prices will continue to rise, although perhaps more gradually.
Not really. There are a few new restaurants and most of them aren't good. Bancroft is just as bad as it's ever been. Obviously Mt. P. can get kicked out of Deal and Wilson and sent to Columbia Heights or Cardozo at some point. Very risky place to drop over $750K on a rowhouse, particularly if federal jobs dry up.
Here we are with the $&%% hip restaurants again. Both of you.
Which neighborhood has the best proximity not to hot "mixologists" but to rec centers, spray parks, soccer fields, safe places for new little bike riders to ride without cars, after school piano lessons and a walkable swimming pool with an option for summer swim team?
PP #1 Mt pleasant (not really) or eckington-truxton-shaw-NoMa-CH (26 year old childless poster #2)?
Every parent likes dining out sometimes or all the time but no actual parent with kids out of the Moby wrap chooses a home because it is steps from a scene. Pps like #2 should stick with PoP comment section instead of parenting site.
Anonymous wrote:The houses are great but the majority of the neighborhood is a serious hike to metro. If u have a car it's an easy drive to Cleveland park. Bancroft still sucks and the white folks bail ASAP after kindergarten. The hordes of drunk Latinos peeing on the sidewalk is a bit much. The commercial strip is ok. But that new apt building beig reconstructed is going to bring another couple hundred low income Latinos back. It's very frustrating that a neighborhood of almost 1 million dollar homes doesn't get u a good school order than a bunch of pupiserias. I'm in Petworth which has its own issue but easy walk to metro very little low income housing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mt Pleasant has changed a lot over the last few years. There are lots of new restaurants, a coffee shop, and a lot of new families with young kids moving in. There is talk of zoning changes so the entire neighborhood will feed to Bancroft, deal, and Wilson. It remains one of the few places in the city that you can live in a reasonable 3 bedroom townhouse with little crime and also walk to work in 20 minutes. I expect prices will continue to rise, although perhaps more gradually.
Not really. There are a few new restaurants and most of them aren't good. Bancroft is just as bad as it's ever been. Obviously Mt. P. can get kicked out of Deal and Wilson and sent to Columbia Heights or Cardozo at some point. Very risky place to drop over $750K on a rowhouse, particularly if federal jobs dry up.
Anonymous wrote:You all realize that the city is moving towards having a $1M minimum for single family and row houses. Many of the larger row houses are being converted to 2 and 3 'family" units. The laws of supply and demand, combined with being in, or near the center of the region make this possible.
10 years from now, $750,000 for a Mt Pleasant row house will seem like a good deal.
Anonymous wrote:Mt Pleasant has changed a lot over the last few years. There are lots of new restaurants, a coffee shop, and a lot of new families with young kids moving in. There is talk of zoning changes so the entire neighborhood will feed to Bancroft, deal, and Wilson. It remains one of the few places in the city that you can live in a reasonable 3 bedroom townhouse with little crime and also walk to work in 20 minutes. I expect prices will continue to rise, although perhaps more gradually.
Then use CH and AM. The other ones are weird.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone tell me why the neighborhood is so hot? It's not that metro accessible, and the amenities are better in other neighborhoods. As I have been house hunting, I don't understand how these houses command the same prices as those on Capitol Hill, which does amenities. I am genuinely curious as I currently don't live in the area.
Metro is a 10 minute walk and bus lines run right through it. Add to that, it's walkable to colhi, admo, dupont, logan, and most of NW. I don't live there, but hoped I would by now. It has a tight knit, active, and vibrant community. It's beautiful. It has diversity both in race and socioeconomic status. Capitol Hill is so isolated in this city. That's changing, but mt p is a fantastic neighborhood.
New transplants who use these sorts of cringeworthy terms for Columbia heights and Adams Morgan are exactly the kind of idiots I'd expect to pay inflated prices in mount pleasant.
Nice try but I grew up here and I used them bc I'm on my phone.
I never heard these made-up terms before.
I'm not the poster of the abbreviated words, but who feels like spelling out full words when your on your phone? Albeit made up, but you get the point.