Anonymous wrote:Powell perhaps?
Anonymous wrote:I'm getting ready for next years lottery. I know this is really early! In considering some safety schools, which ones do you believe have a real chance of turning the corner? It's like buying real estate before the market gets hot. I think my strategy will be listing mostly schools that are considered safeties but with real potential to rise. I'm going to give up entirely on the sought after schools.
What schools meet this criteria and why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh, Barnard? The OP wanted up and coming schools that she had a possibility of getting a slot in the lottery. The train left a few years ago on that school.
Since the OP wants projections, I would look at neighborhoods that are rapidly gentrifying, like Riggs Park, Michigan Park, and Woodbridge. As others have mentioned, Burroughs is up and coming and I would suspect that LaSalle would be next or possibly Brookland. Brookland is very close to the new middle school, so that is big plus.
Change at schools lags behind gentrification by many years, if not decades. You don't want to look at places that are gentrifying just now, but at places that are several years past the beginning of the gentrification process.
That area is several years past the beginning of gentrification. It was the "It" school in the neighborhood before Powell and Bruce-Monroe and those two schools have surpassed it in popularity. Not in decades, but in about 3 years.
Anyway, I think the unified lottery makes it so that preferences - sibling, boundary or proximity - are your best shot at getting into any DCPS. There will be the few hundred families who get into charters, and then almost everyone else will get matched with their neighborhood school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tyler (regular, you have no chance for SI if you are not in bounds or at least have sibling OOB/proximity preference) is fine for early education. I would not send my kid there for 'regular' school but pre-school/pre-k is fine.
I think it's fine for K-2 also.
Anonymous wrote:Tyler (regular, you have no chance for SI if you are not in bounds or at least have sibling OOB/proximity preference) is fine for early education. I would not send my kid there for 'regular' school but pre-school/pre-k is fine.
Anonymous wrote:I would visit Amidon, Payne, and Minor if I had a two year old now. I would also give my in-boundary a serious look even if I'd heard negative things about it.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. I really think the only way to have a chance at a decent DCPS is to list 12 up-and-coming schools and hope for the best. Not sure if I can identify 12 that show enough promise to make it on my list. It's a gamble in that there is no guarantee that the school I get matched to will ever get over that hump, but its no more of a gamble than trying to lottery for a highly sought after school.