Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
Chinese is good, but the Spanish needs to be improved. After 10 years of immersion (Pre K - 8) we should expect better results in terms of literacy. A stronger Spanish curriculum that has a capstone AP course in 8th grade would do a lot to improve academics and retention at the school. Many more families would stay if their child is earning college credit at Adams.
You expect a 7th or 8th grader to earn credit for college courses? Are you serious?!? What schools offer that option?
Someone told me it is the most common AP course for 8th graders. In any case, many schools do offer AP Spanish in 8th grade. It is perfectly feasible and not a pipe dream. Look it up on the web. For example, http://www.teamiddleschoolspanish.org/overview_booklet.pdf
Do you realize that no student has to take an AP class in order to sit for an AP exam? So, why don't you just have your 8th grader take the AP exam? I really don't think that Oyster should waste its scarce resources by offering a course like AP Spanish. Btw, it would be much smarter to have your kid wait to take the AP exam in high school; presumably after he/she has more advanced Spanish language/literature classes. Your kid will probably stand a much better chance of earning a 4 or 5 on the exam.
[Report Post]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
Chinese is good, but the Spanish needs to be improved. After 10 years of immersion (Pre K - 8) we should expect better results in terms of literacy. A stronger Spanish curriculum that has a capstone AP course in 8th grade would do a lot to improve academics and retention at the school. Many more families would stay if their child is earning college credit at Adams.
You expect a 7th or 8th grader to earn credit for college courses? Are you serious?!? What schools offer that option?
Someone told me it is the most common AP course for 8th graders. In any case, many schools do offer AP Spanish in 8th grade. It is perfectly feasible and not a pipe dream. Look it up on the web. For example, http://www.teamiddleschoolspanish.org/overview_booklet.pdf
Anonymous wrote:
I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
Chinese is good, but the Spanish needs to be improved. After 10 years of immersion (Pre K - 8) we should expect better results in terms of literacy. A stronger Spanish curriculum that has a capstone AP course in 8th grade would do a lot to improve academics and retention at the school. Many more families would stay if their child is earning college credit at Adams.
You expect a 7th or 8th grader to earn credit for college courses? Are you serious?!? What schools offer that option?
Anonymous wrote:I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
Chinese is good, but the Spanish needs to be improved. After 10 years of immersion (Pre K - 8) we should expect better results in terms of literacy. A stronger Spanish curriculum that has a capstone AP course in 8th grade would do a lot to improve academics and retention at the school. Many more families would stay if their child is earning college credit at Adams.
I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
I like that Adams offers Chinese in MS to students that don't need extra support in English or Spanish. DC is excited learning Chinese with Ms. Li and discusses Chinese phonetics with child of friends that goes to posh GDS.
From what I hear Deal is like Switzerland while Oyster Adams is more like Costa Rica. I agree, we should be a bit more Swiss but not lose the Gallo Pinto along the way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone please provide a concrete reason why the two campus thing is bad? I keep hearing that, but I have yet to hear a single concrete example of why it is a problem. As the parent of a kid whose teams already compete with gym time, I think consolidating the whole school into one building with one gym, one set of outdoor play areas and one lunch room would be an absolute nightmare. Furthermore, I would expect the parents of kindergarteners to be reluctant to send their tiny kids to the same school as 8th graders. We've gone through both buildings, and we think it works great. I get that it might be inconvenient for the principal, but won't she have more APs next year per student than any other school in DCPS?
The two campus model is not bad--I prefer it as well. Monica just didn't like the arrangement.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please provide a concrete reason why the two campus thing is bad? I keep hearing that, but I have yet to hear a single concrete example of why it is a problem. As the parent of a kid whose teams already compete with gym time, I think consolidating the whole school into one building with one gym, one set of outdoor play areas and one lunch room would be an absolute nightmare. Furthermore, I would expect the parents of kindergarteners to be reluctant to send their tiny kids to the same school as 8th graders. We've gone through both buildings, and we think it works great. I get that it might be inconvenient for the principal, but won't she have more APs next year per student than any other school in DCPS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone please provide a concrete reason why the two campus thing is bad? I keep hearing that, but I have yet to hear a single concrete example of why it is a problem. As the parent of a kid whose teams already compete with gym time, I think consolidating the whole school into one building with one gym, one set of outdoor play areas and one lunch room would be an absolute nightmare. Furthermore, I would expect the parents of kindergarteners to be reluctant to send their tiny kids to the same school as 8th graders. We've gone through both buildings, and we think it works great. I get that it might be inconvenient for the principal, but won't she have more APs next year per student than any other school in DCPS?
I don't think it's just "inconvenient" for the principal--it makes it harder for her to directly manage her APs and other staff when she is running between two campuses that are far away from one another. And I do not have the confidence that the new principal, who has very little experience, will be able to handle it.
Anonymous wrote:Improve it from what to what? Higher overall scores? Higher percentages of advanced students? Improvement in Spanish grammar? One building? A better website? Keep more IB families no matter how high the % of non-Spanish speaking families?
None of these things matter to DCPS. O-A is about as good as it's going to get in terms of quantitative measures. The new principal looks like she was put in there as part of the overall DCPS middle school retention effort. They are going to throw a lot of stuff at the middle school grades for 3 years or so to see if they can stem the tide of flight to charters.
But there is no long-term strategy for the school or any of the dual-language programs in DCPS. It has been completely absent from the entire DME process.
To improve the qualitative elements of the school that many families complain about, all she needs to do is fire the MS AP, move the 4-5th grade AP to the lower grades at Oyster building, hire a superb Dean of Students, get rid of some entrenched staff who have been coasting on the success of individual teachers.
We're IB and bilingual at O-A and have had mixed results. We're contemplating leaving for many reasons, but we're wondering what dual language schools will be better? The only dual immersion secondary school is CHEC.
An easy to use web platform would be great, but first there needs to be consistency in teaching and well-organized administration. Like PP said, many of the crises were self-made or poorly communicated. It would be pretty easy to improve some of the basic operations at O-A.
The elephant in the room is whether it can or will continue as many things to many people. How long can it stay as a neighborhood, bilingual, inclusion, two campus, PK-8 school, that feeds into an English-only high school?
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please provide a concrete reason why the two campus thing is bad? I keep hearing that, but I have yet to hear a single concrete example of why it is a problem. As the parent of a kid whose teams already compete with gym time, I think consolidating the whole school into one building with one gym, one set of outdoor play areas and one lunch room would be an absolute nightmare. Furthermore, I would expect the parents of kindergarteners to be reluctant to send their tiny kids to the same school as 8th graders. We've gone through both buildings, and we think it works great. I get that it might be inconvenient for the principal, but won't she have more APs next year per student than any other school in DCPS?