Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about why a woman who is 40+ and professionally established would so prefer a never-married over a divorced man that she would bother to discount the divorced guy?
OP again. They are open to divorced men. But other than online, they can't seem to meet them in real life. This seems to be a common situation in my circles so I thought I'd ask. In their twenties and early thirties they were focused on careers but I think they thought they would meet someone along the way. Yet suddenly they're 37, 41, 43 and no more prospects than five years ago. I'm sure some of them would move out west if they met the right guy but now they have careers on the east coast so starting anew in Seattle or Denver with only the hopes that the odds are better doesn't seem like the best idea.
Anonymous wrote:This. I'm married with kids but I do a lot of activities. No shortage of single guys, but they don't want the type of woman that is still single at 40+. Usually these women were career-obsessed, or list/requirement obsessed, or both in their prime dating years and they'd focus on all of the wrong things. As they've aged, instead of loosening up they have become (understandably) bitter. That's not attractive. There are, of course, successful, confident, sexy women at 40+ but they have no shortage of admirers, much like their 20-30 something counterparts do. Personality and confidence are huge factors here.
I remember my male friends in their early to mid 30s were looking for a life partner. Their female peers that were still single but not by choice sometimes were too but they came with a laundry list of requirements. Too short? Back to the pond you go. Not working in the right firm/agency/office? Not ambitious enough. Women do a disservice to each other by saying that the perfect guy is out there. He's not. He does not exist. There are lots of men that can be perfect for YOU but usually it involves some patience and training. If you enjoy someone's company and they can be a good partner to you, at any age, just run with it. Ignore the list.
I'm Jewish also, so I get that aspect. I did marry another Jew but I also have a lot of friends that are happy with non-Jews. This is a very personal issue and it depends on how you and your partner want to raise a family.
Then there is the last and touchiest point: there just are more women than men in this city. 40 something men are able to get 30 something women. But these then goes back to loosening requirements.
Anonymous wrote:I get hit on all the time by single men. Where are you trying to find one? I bike, run, hike, row, the Seersucker Social, etc. If you are looking in church or at a restaurant, they aren't there.
Anonymous wrote:It kind of sounds like they missed the boat, to be honest. It's really difficult for a woman to get married for the first time past the age of 35. I imagine these women probably have a laundry list of qualifications to match their own - potential partner has to be Jewish, high income, educated at certain colleges, good family, similar age (not too much older or younger), good looking/in shape, etc. There's just not a lot of men that fit into that mold, period, and the ones that do, have their choice of women. I agree they should move out west, the dating market is much better for women in cities like Seattle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren't many of them. My single friends and I have tried all of the dating websites and the few men who are okay with a woman who is too old for kids just seem odd. I have a kid so I a stuck between being too old to have another kid and has one of her own. The only men who seem interested are men who already have their own kids. They don't seem to understand that I have mine 24/7.
odd in what way? just curious
not in the right tax bracket odd
ah ok - why didn't you just say that then (i.e. just put in your profile, 'no poors')?
Anonymous wrote:I know a few - a couple of divorced dads from school, a couple of my neighbors, a couple of guys at work. Don't know how a single woman would meet men like them. The dads you'd probably have a hard time meeting them outside school functions/kid-oriented stuff. The never-marrieds are kind of set in their bachelor ways by the time they hit their late 30s/early 40s and hang out in the golf course, sports events, sports bars. Guess that's where your single friends would have to go to run into them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about why a woman who is 40+ and professionally established would so prefer a never-married over a divorced man that she would bother to discount the divorced guy?
My friends all seem to agree that never-married men over 40 are usually odd or commitment-phones. You know a divorced guy was at least willing to try.
As for what these women were doing in their 20's, I know what they were doing -- they were being incredibly picky. They wouldn't even consider going out with a guy that wasn't perfect. They are all jealous of my wonderful husband, but they would have never given him a chance. I'd try to set them up with great guys, but they always had some "flaw" that disqualified them.
Phobes not phones. I hate autocorrect.
Anonymous wrote:I get hit on all the time by single men. Where are you trying to find one? I bike, run, hike, row, the Seersucker Social, etc. If you are looking in church or at a restaurant, they aren't there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about why a woman who is 40+ and professionally established would so prefer a never-married over a divorced man that she would bother to discount the divorced guy?
My friends all seem to agree that never-married men over 40 are usually odd or commitment-phones. You know a divorced guy was at least willing to try.
As for what these women were doing in their 20's, I know what they were doing -- they were being incredibly picky. They wouldn't even consider going out with a guy that wasn't perfect. They are all jealous of my wonderful husband, but they would have never given him a chance. I'd try to set them up with great guys, but they always had some "flaw" that disqualified them.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious about why a woman who is 40+ and professionally established would so prefer a never-married over a divorced man that she would bother to discount the divorced guy?