Anonymous wrote:How much does it matter to be 'challenged' at school as a kid?
I feel like I was never really challenged until grad school, and it was fine for me. I had more time to do other things, reading other books I liked, going places with my parents w/o stressing about homework, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is not being challenged = my kid is around too many other kids with behavior issues. As a teacher what I love this year is that all my high SES parents threaten to leave because of lack of rigor- when the only truly advanced kid I have is FARMS. The real question is , if DCPs really did g&t how would all the parents react when they realized their kid was just average.
I think it is a shame that that one advanced child in your class doesn't get additional resources. My suspicion is that the powers that be at DCPS think that the G&T classes would be filled with white kids. I'm pretty certain they would be the opposite. I wish they would try this out -- it would shut up the helicopter parents and give some students from hard backgrounds a real chance to excel.
Here here!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is not being challenged = my kid is around too many other kids with behavior issues. As a teacher what I love this year is that all my high SES parents threaten to leave because of lack of rigor- when the only truly advanced kid I have is FARMS. The real question is , if DCPs really did g&t how would all the parents react when they realized their kid was just average.
I think it is a shame that that one advanced child in your class doesn't get additional resources. My suspicion is that the powers that be at DCPS think that the G&T classes would be filled with white kids. I'm pretty certain they would be the opposite. I wish they would try this out -- it would shut up the helicopter parents and give some students from hard backgrounds a real chance to excel.
Anonymous wrote:There's excellent differentiation at my kids' JKLMM school; it is a particular focus of the principal's, and he has sent teachers for training to ensure they are able to teach kids at different levels in the same room. Both of my kids are advanced in reading--one reading 4+ grades above his grade level--and they are both challenged and engaged.
I'd much rather have my kids in diverse classrooms where each kid is taught as his/her level than in a pull-out G&T program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think reading 2 grades above level is likely 'average' in high SES school districts and not exactly something to write home about.
we just got an eval back from KK that evaluated dc for a possible learning disability. Reading levels etc were ranked by grade - he is in 2nd. His reading level was that of a 5th 1/2 grader, comprehension 5th nothing below 4th, yet he gets "3s'" on each report card until the last and is not in the highest level reading group but rather in the middle of the alphabet.
My dd is in Z - the highest reading level - in 4th. So I tend to agree with this assessment that kids are judged relative to each other. I had no idea that my child was reading above grade level - I was frustrated and angry as all hell that I could not get him to advance the way his sib had. But the benefit of this is they identify problems that might be ignored at other schools because dc is passing every subject but clearly has a problem with math......
Anonymous wrote:There's excellent differentiation at my kids' JKLMM school; it is a particular focus of the principal's, and he has sent teachers for training to ensure they are able to teach kids at different levels in the same room. Both of my kids are advanced in reading--one reading 4+ grades above his grade level--and they are both challenged and engaged.
I'd much rather have my kids in diverse classrooms where each kid is taught as his/her level than in a pull-out G&T program.
Anonymous wrote:There's excellent differentiation at my kids' JKLMM school; it is a particular focus of the principal's, and he has sent teachers for training to ensure they are able to teach kids at different levels in the same room. Both of my kids are advanced in reading--one reading 4+ grades above his grade level--and they are both challenged and engaged.
I'd much rather have my kids in diverse classrooms where each kid is taught as his/her level than in a pull-out G&T program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's excellent differentiation at my kids' JKLMM school; it is a particular focus of the principal's, and he has sent teachers for training to ensure they are able to teach kids at different levels in the same room. Both of my kids are advanced in reading--one reading 4+ grades above his grade level--and they are both challenged and engaged.
I'd much rather have my kids in diverse classrooms where each kid is taught as his/her level than in a pull-out G&T program.
Differentiation works best when you are talking about a mild range in performance.
However, when you have a class with kids significantly below grade level the wheels start to fall off. If the lowest students cannot access the curriculum than that is, naturally where the attention and focus go.
Anonymous wrote:There's excellent differentiation at my kids' JKLMM school; it is a particular focus of the principal's, and he has sent teachers for training to ensure they are able to teach kids at different levels in the same room. Both of my kids are advanced in reading--one reading 4+ grades above his grade level--and they are both challenged and engaged.
I'd much rather have my kids in diverse classrooms where each kid is taught as his/her level than in a pull-out G&T program.
Anonymous wrote:I think reading 2 grades above level is likely 'average' in high SES school districts and not exactly something to write home about.