Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?
Anonymous wrote:Well, it matters what he did before if he hit her before. Otherwise, not really. Is he hurt? I suspect not. Especially if he thinks taking his keys/phone/glasses is the worst part of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?
Doesn't matter. He asked for help on getting out of the relationship. All anyone needs to know. The details are for the police, DA, and a judge.
Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
Continuity is the least of your problems.
The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.
You clearly have never been in an abusive relationship. Good. I am genuinely happy for you. However, those of us not so fortunate realize that for an abuser, anything is provocation: waking up 2 minute early, waking up 2 minutes late, preparing a favorite meal, forgetting a favorite meal, putting a bra in the dryer, not putting a bra in the dryer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
Continuity is the least of your problems.
The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.
You clearly have never been in an abusive relationship. Good. I am genuinely happy for you. However, those of us not so fortunate realize that for an abuser, anything is provocation: waking up 2 minute early, waking up 2 minutes late, preparing a favorite meal, forgetting a favorite meal, putting a bra in the dryer, not putting a bra in the dryer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
Continuity is the least of your problems.
The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
Continuity is the least of your problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.
+1000
Me,too.I could get to the car and grab a large item like a purse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.
+1000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.
Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?