Anonymous wrote:Oldest of three. Plus my siblings are twins. Ugh. I was always left out. As the oldest with the birth of my siblings I was suddenly supposed to grow up much faster I think. They always had birthday parties together, same circle of friends, loved each other to death...yeah I felt very very left out when I was young. It's okay now, but I still feel it. I love them to death, but I sure didn't feel that way during my childhood. It's probably not that dramatic if you don't have twins (identical) and a third...but with twins - it was horrible.
Anonymous wrote:We receive so many comments on this about having three. Did anyone truly feel left out or that a sibling was constantly left out because your parents did not have a fourth child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am surprised at how many are stopping at two becuase of fear of someone being "left out". If this is the ONLY reason, it is a really dumb one.
Well, that, and that daycare = my (imaginary) beach house mortgage
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it was always me and "the boys". There is 3 years between us and I am the oldest. I felt pushed into being the sensible, grown-up, mature one, while they were lumped together being boisterous and doing what boys do.
It's another reason why we won't be having 3.
The most convincing argument against having 3 though is that the middle child gets shafted. there are benefits to being the oldest and the youngest but the middle child really has neither.
Anonymous wrote:I am surprised at how many are stopping at two becuase of fear of someone being "left out". If this is the ONLY reason, it is a really dumb one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm one of three girls (the oldest) and am constantly the odd man out. This is also why I won't have three kids. I'm stopping at 2.
I thought I was stopping at 2 and got twins the second time around . . . so you never know!