Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Hence why I said my opinion. I don't assume it's your opinion or your experience. My point was that my experiences shape my personal opinions which in turn shape my behavior. Quite logical actually. Your unwarranted aggression is intense though... Good luck with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Hands-down, the most self-absorbed adults I know were younger siblings (although I know many youngest children who are not that way). I don't know the sibling status of everyone, but the onlies I know as adults tend to be anything but self-absorbed--they have close friendship networks and are supportive and caring friends, are self-reliant and responsible, and don't think the world revolves around them.
I suspect the PP has a lot of confirmation bias going on. Only children are basically like other children. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Hence why I said my opinion. I don't assume it's your opinion or your experience. My point was that my experiences shape my personal opinions which in turn shape my behavior. Quite logical actually. Your unwarranted aggression is intense though... Good luck with that.
I'm not the poster you are responding to. However, I think it's shitty and mean of you and your friends to use "such only children" in a derogatory and insulting way.
Therefore, it is my opinion that you are an a-hole.
Apologies, it really isn't meant in a mean spirited way by anyone in my group of friends, but just an acknowledgement that we all come from different places, have different quirks, different personalities and different strengths and weaknesses. Wasn't meant to be offensive and was just contributing my two cents b/c as I said, the idea of having just one child is very, very appealing to me. I'm surprised by the vitriol, but like I said, wasn't trying to be hurtful or offensive to anyone here. How it is referenced in my friend group I am completely comfortable with, but guess friend groups have nuanced dynamics that are tough to convey in anonymous forum posts.
For what it's worth, I do not at all judge a parent who decides to only have one child. And would never dream of it being my business to ask when or if another one was planned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Hence why I said my opinion. I don't assume it's your opinion or your experience. My point was that my experiences shape my personal opinions which in turn shape my behavior. Quite logical actually. Your unwarranted aggression is intense though... Good luck with that.
I'm not the poster you are responding to. However, I think it's shitty and mean of you and your friends to use "such only children" in a derogatory and insulting way.
Therefore, it is my opinion that you are an a-hole.
Anonymous wrote:If anyone is crass enough to say something about it, make them feel really bad by saying that due to medical complications you were unable to bear more children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
so do adults with siblings tend to be gossiping hens later in life?
If you have a very close group of girlfriends and you never, ever discuss the actions of one another, you are a unicorn. It isn't mean spirited and doesn't mean we ,love them less. In fact, I actually thin it's an acceptance of others' flaws and unconditional love. We recognize where a behavior comes from, acknowledge it, and move on. The same as saying "I'm annoyed that Sally never answers my calls, but I know she has been super stressed at work, so that's probably it. Oh well."
Hardly gossiping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IMO, only children tend to be more self absorbed later in life. I have multiple close friends who I love, but who we all describe as "such only children" and the meaning is instantly understood. The only time I've seen only children avoid this is when there is a specific source of hardship in childhood so that they learn it isn't all about them (eg, a parent has an illness).
Having said this, I don't love the idea of having a second child, but the above keeps me motivated to do so.
Your opinion is stupid. It's cute that you ascribe your own personal experiences to the general public. Like you, apparently, I have multiple only child close friends, and none of them are self-absorbed. The most self-absorbed people I know have siblings, in some cases, more than one. I guess -- by your logic that one person's anecdotal evidence = truth -- that means that those of us with siblings (including me) are way more self-absorbed than only children.
Hence why I said my opinion. I don't assume it's your opinion or your experience. My point was that my experiences shape my personal opinions which in turn shape my behavior. Quite logical actually. Your unwarranted aggression is intense though... Good luck with that.