Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Exactly why Great Schools isn't very useful.
I find the test scores and breakdowns by demographic very useful. I also find the FARM rate very useful.
I guess FARM rates are useful if you're trying to avoid poor kids.
But isn't that what the whole 'good school' thing is all about?
Apparently it is for some people. I want a high-quality school. Why should I care if the FARMS rate is high?
http://www.fairtest.org/teacher-quality-important-cannot-overcome-poverty
The point of this article is that poorer kids have lower test scores than wealthier kids, even with strong teaching. That's not exactly surprising and has nothing to do with my kids, who are not poor. If a high-FARMS school offers honors and AP classes ensuring that intelligent and strongly-motivated students are challenged, again, why would I care if some of the other students are poor?
I am beginning to think that what school your kids go to is a status symbol for some parents. If you can't afford private school, the next best thing is to brag about how great the public school you got your kid into is. And for it to be a status symbol it has to be devoid of poor children.
Anonymous wrote:
I am beginning to think that what school your kids go to is a status symbol for some parents. If you can't afford private school, the next best thing is to brag about how great the public school you got your kid into is. And for it to be a status symbol it has to be devoid of poor children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Exactly why Great Schools isn't very useful.
I find the test scores and breakdowns by demographic very useful. I also find the FARM rate very useful.
I guess FARM rates are useful if you're trying to avoid poor kids.
But isn't that what the whole 'good school' thing is all about?
Apparently it is for some people. I want a high-quality school. Why should I care if the FARMS rate is high?
http://www.fairtest.org/teacher-quality-important-cannot-overcome-poverty
The point of this article is that poorer kids have lower test scores than wealthier kids, even with strong teaching. That's not exactly surprising and has nothing to do with my kids, who are not poor. If a high-FARMS school offers honors and AP classes ensuring that intelligent and strongly-motivated students are challenged, again, why would I care if some of the other students are poor?
I am beginning to think that what school your kids go to is a status symbol for some parents. If you can't afford private school, the next best thing is to brag about how great the public school you got your kid into is. And for it to be a status symbol it has to be devoid of poor children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Exactly why Great Schools isn't very useful.
I find the test scores and breakdowns by demographic very useful. I also find the FARM rate very useful.
I guess FARM rates are useful if you're trying to avoid poor kids.
But isn't that what the whole 'good school' thing is all about?
Apparently it is for some people. I want a high-quality school. Why should I care if the FARMS rate is high?
http://www.fairtest.org/teacher-quality-important-cannot-overcome-poverty
The point of this article is that poorer kids have lower test scores than wealthier kids, even with strong teaching. That's not exactly surprising and has nothing to do with my kids, who are not poor. If a high-FARMS school offers honors and AP classes ensuring that intelligent and strongly-motivated students are challenged, again, why would I care if some of the other students are poor?
Anonymous wrote:We preferred to live in a nice big house in DC. Our children attend private school. I hope one day DCPS gets its act together!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Exactly why Great Schools isn't very useful.
I find the test scores and breakdowns by demographic very useful. I also find the FARM rate very useful.
I guess FARM rates are useful if you're trying to avoid poor kids.
But isn't that what the whole 'good school' thing is all about?
Apparently it is for some people. I want a high-quality school. Why should I care if the FARMS rate is high?
http://www.fairtest.org/teacher-quality-important-cannot-overcome-poverty
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools are overrated. The home environment is what counts. The school does very little. Poor Performing schools draw from areas with mostly bad environments. Good Schools don't. I'd get the house. You're at the whim of redistricting anyways.
This is what people who pick the house always say and it vastly underestimates the amount that a school counts. You don't get a second crack at early education, especially with working parents who aren't going to be conducting a virtual late afternoon home school to make up for deficiencies in their school curriculum. Even if you have a SAH parent kids don't want to sit for another school session after being at an inferior school all day. My sister (who doesn't live around here) pulled her second child from private school to save $$, thinking that the school itself didn't matter that much and that their local public would be fine. Now that they've both graduated HS, she regrets it and says she can see a real difference in the education her second child received as a result.
Go for the good school district. The value of your property is far more likely to increase and you'll have either enough equity to make changes over time or to sell for a big profit and move when you no longer care about the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Schools are overrated. The home environment is what counts. The school does very little. Poor Performing schools draw from areas with mostly bad environments. Good Schools don't. I'd get the house. You're at the whim of redistricting anyways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends on how you define school quality. Did you actually research whether people are happy with the school or just go by Great Schools?
Using the population that is attending the school is a terrible way to judge the quality of the education.
Exactly why Great Schools isn't very useful.
I find the test scores and breakdowns by demographic very useful. I also find the FARM rate very useful.
I guess FARM rates are useful if you're trying to avoid poor kids.
But isn't that what the whole 'good school' thing is all about?
Apparently it is for some people. I want a high-quality school. Why should I care if the FARMS rate is high?