Anonymous wrote:Argyle is not a test in magnet. For the test in magnets, they do provide bus transportation. You are right that they don't provide transportation to Argyle, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP- but not continuing to the MS magnet isn't just because the children were mis-identified. Plenty of families choose to stay at home MS to avoid long commute to their MS Magnet option. Just as some families choose not to do HGC for the ES commute but may decide later it is worth it for MS.
Agreed. We're in an HGC and decided not to even apply for the middle school magnet. The bus ride was 1:40+ in the morning and would have picked up at 6:10. Crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More accurate to test kids in 3rd than second? I have no idea. Curious though.
Earlier scores aren't as accurate as scores in 3rd. Testing in 1st or 2nd would favor kids from enriched environments.
This. I think there might be a chapter in *NurtureShock* about testing for gifted programs and how early testing misses qualified kids. The kids who do get in benefit from the program, so they appear to remain gifted, but kids who simply developed a little later but are qualified never get in. I think testing in third grade is supposed to be more accurate.
Anonymous wrote:i am poster 20:25. son is now in 5th and is doing fine but frankly is bored esp under curr 2.0 (not an indictment of the curriculum, just commenting since he's had both). i do not think son is a genius or "gifted," but nor do i think that most of the kids admitted from his grade were either. i do think he would have done just as well there as the kids we know from his school who attended (and they've all loved the hgc program, btw). my son did not test well on the hgc test - no idea why, since his 2nd grade gifted testing administered by mcps was highest in his class and since he seemed to do well on the wppsi and wisc tests. but it doesn't really matter since the hgc admittance is almost exclusively based on the hgc test scores. his 2nd grade teacher thought he'd be a shoo in. his 3rd grade teacher did recommend him (according to her - the parents never see that info) but she was a dud and probably didn't advocate for him very much. i know i sound bitter but i was disappointed in the hgc process - obviously since my child wasn't admitted - but i suspect my kid just had an off day on the test and it seems a pretty big penalty to have the whole admittance rest on that (even the sat's can be taken more than once). Also having seen who was admitted from our school and who was not, I can see that is was kind of a crapshoot bc many qualified kids did not get admitted and several did get admitted out of left field. The only reason I posted any of this on this thread is just to say to not put all your eggs in that basket!
Anonymous wrote:Is the IQ section more important than the verbal or quant section in the HGC admissions test?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Median is median for admitted students.
How do you know? Did someone in GT admissions tell you this or is this an assumption? Generally curios.
It says that in the letter
Anonymous wrote:I went to FCPS and switched schools in 3rd grade for the GT program. Elementary school was until 6th grade, so I was at the new school for 4 years.
Here in MoCo, the HGC program doesn't start till 4th and then after 5th they are off to middle school. It seems like a huge change for just two years. Why not start in 3rd?
Anonymous wrote:PP- but not continuing to the MS magnet isn't just because the children were mis-identified. Plenty of families choose to stay at home MS to avoid long commute to their MS Magnet option. Just as some families choose not to do HGC for the ES commute but may decide later it is worth it for MS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More accurate to test kids in 3rd than second? I have no idea. Curious though.
Earlier scores aren't as accurate as scores in 3rd. Testing in 1st or 2nd would favor kids from enriched environments.
This. I think there might be a chapter in *NurtureShock* about testing for gifted programs and how early testing misses qualified kids. The kids who do get in benefit from the program, so they appear to remain gifted, but kids who simply developed a little later but are qualified never get in. I think testing in third grade is supposed to be more accurate.