Anonymous wrote:The right's strange obsession with the Clintons continues. . .

Bizarre, isn't it? There is nothing or no one that I have this kind of creepy obsession about.

Bill and Hillary are public people by choice. If Hillary doesn't mind Bill shagging everybody but her she should explain her philosophy to the voters so they can decide whether she is psychologically normal or not. Personally I think she has deep deep psychological issues of inferiority and shame.

The picture in this article is reflective of her deep personality in my opinion.

http://m.lvsun.com/news/2014/apr/10/hillary-clinton-ducks-shoe-thrown-her-during-las-v/


Not presidential at all.

I think marital issues are marital issues. That is their business, their marriage. Is cheating wrong, whichever side of the political aisle you are on? Yes. But it doesn't really make that much difference to me, unless you're a politician who goes on rants about family values, etc, etc. then gets caught using hookers or having an affair with a staffer or something like that.

Who is saying you aren't allowed to know who he has slept with post-Monica? It isn't like they are going to kill you for digging into things. I think it's a weird obsession to care that much whether or not he's been off banging other women since he has been out of office, but have at it if you really care that much about the details of his sex life.

Look, I couldn't personally stay with a man who openly cheated on me, but I have long believed it was a power/political union for them anyway. I actually think they respect each others intelligence and political instincts. There are all kinds of marriages, and many of them are of some sort of convenience.

The right's strange obsession with the Clintons continues. . .

Aren't the current and former girlfriends of a former President historically important information ? Is Hillary's psychology so fragile that we aren't allowed to record history?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By the way... Why aren't we allowed to know who Hillary's husband has been hooking up with since Monica ?

Go ahead and figure it out if you are so determined to know.

In the meantime, he will continue the work of his foundation, which has done many good things around the world.

How his sex life is relevant to just about anything is beyond me, though. He obviously is a cheat, she obviously tolerates it, for whatever reason. We've all known this for 20+ years. It is not new information. Take them or leave them, but frankly, very few people give a shit anymore.

I think it's psychologically interesting that she still calls him her husband when it's quite obvious he is physically repulsed by her. I understand him, I mean, it makes sense. I don't know is we want a President with such low self esteem and deep psychological issues .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By the way... Why aren't we allowed to know who Hillary's husband has been hooking up with since Monica ?

Go ahead and figure it out if you are so determined to know.

In the meantime, he will continue the work of his foundation, which has done many good things around the world.

How his sex life is relevant to just about anything is beyond me, though. He obviously is a cheat, she obviously tolerates it, for whatever reason. We've all known this for 20+ years. It is not new information. Take them or leave them, but frankly, very few people give a shit anymore.

You took the bait. Too bad.

Anonymous wrote:By the way... Why aren't we allowed to know who Hillary's husband has been hooking up with since Monica ?

Go ahead and figure it out if you are so determined to know.

In the meantime, he will continue the work of his foundation, which has done many good things around the world.

How his sex life is relevant to just about anything is beyond me, though. He obviously is a cheat, she obviously tolerates it, for whatever reason. We've all known this for 20+ years. It is not new information. Take them or leave them, but frankly, very few people give a shit anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chelsea Clinton is a vivacious and smart woman who has previously made public comments about her desire to have a child and be a mother (and about her love for her own mother). Don't beat her up. She is smart, lovely, and thoroughly normal.

+1

+2 She has a Bachelor's degree from Stanford, master's degrees from both Columbia and Oxford and was just awarded a PhD from Oxford. Chelsea doesn't need props.

By the way... Why aren't we allowed to know who Hillary's husband has been hooking up with since Monica ?

I really think RR will be our last "old" president. Ageism is perfectly legal at the ballot box.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think being a grandma definitely ages Hillary. Absurd, but still.

This would never be said about a man. Ridiculous.

IDK. A man becoming a grandma could garner some unwanted attention.

this is what grandparents in politics look like:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think being a grandma definitely ages Hillary. Absurd, but still.

This would never be said about a man. Ridiculous.

IDK. A man becoming a grandma could garner some unwanted attention.

I agree. Chelsea is not royalty, just a kid of a disgraced politician. The fuss is a political stunt. What is the big deal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doubt it's a stunt, though I can't believe that she could talk with any hint of serious credibility about running for mayor of NY or Senate, as she did.

She has just about zero significant accomplishments in anything that would remotely qualify her for a significant public position. Yet there's that familial sense of entitlement that will keep me (a Dem-now-independent and strongly anti-Republican) from voting for her mother.

She's the former senator from New York and the former Secretary of State.

She is now more qualified than George W. Bush or Barack Obama when they were elected.

What the fuck do you want in a candidate?

To be fair, everybody was more qualified than Barack Obama.