Anonymous wrote:Considering how out of touch Cheh is with most W3 issues, i'm glad to see she issued this.
Anonymous wrote:I am glad someone has issued a statement about these proposals!
Under at least one proposal, HS would be by lottery city-wide. That would affect all students and parents in all wards including Ward 3.
The grandfathering issue is still outstanding but I have heard many a parent wish aloud that the boundary change proposal had included some sort of statement about it. At least they could have said that kids in schools right now could stay there rather than having so many families wondering if they would have to start thinking about a move in less than 18 months.
Mary Cheh has voiced the concerns of her constituents. That's called representation.
Anonymous wrote:From WaPo 3/28
“I won’t support a plan that moves children from a higher-performing to a lower-performing school,”... “Out of fairness to the work that has been done, I would be willing to look at the plan. But I think the emphasis should have been on improving programming, not on redrawing boundaries.”
“We’re going to have to make some decisions around boundaries. Does it have to be by 2015? I don’t think so.”
Guess which one is the gay, white, male, former RINO?
I'm a straight, black, woman, Dem, but I have zero confidence in Bowser's ability to lead in the area of education.
Catania has earned my vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like Mary Cheh!
I want to like Mary Cheh but experience with her had been that she's good on lip service but very bad on delivery.
We had the opposite experience. Our neighborhood had a problem related to road paving, and she became our champion, and didn't let city staff rest until the issue was fixed. No one here is a big donor or similar...so we were surprised and impressed by her level of care and follow-up. She can count on our votes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in Ward 4 and I expect Bowser to make a statement too. I don't care that she's running for mayor...she's still my rep. And Catania needs to make his position clear too. You can't chair the Ed Committee and NOT ring in on these proposals.
Bowser's statement will be as vague as possible, she's searching for support east of the river. Fortunately she's got race and the Dem machine on her side. Catania's position is going to be the most interesting and complex. He's smarter than Bowser and Gray combined (though so is my cat). He's certainly the most informed about Education and attuned to the differences between charters and DCPS. He's probably unelectable, being white, gay, and non-Dem, but I'll vote for him anyway. Cheh is like an exotic plant, she couldn't survive outside of Ward 3.
Wow, that's a not so subtle dog whistle there. Agree with 11:54, Gray may have bungled his rep and political future if it is ever proven that he engaged in the shadow campaign. That said, Gray, Mendelson, Catania, Cheh, Evans - all four are quality, engaged, knowledgeable pols.
There's nothing subtle in my assertion that large swaths of DC will vote against Catania because he is A) white, B) gay, and C) not a Democrat. I'm openly calling out the city on its biases, and I'm not afraid to say so. The racists, homophobes, and closedminded Democrats-uber-alles voters of this city absolutely cannot and will not open their eyes to the fact that he is far more competent than his opponent. DC likes to think it cares about diversity, but it does not and just wait until the general election for proof.
Whether Cantania is competent or not is your opinion, not fact. Before he was "The Education Champion!" he was "The Healthcare Champion!" and the city hasn't exactly made great strides in that area either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like Mary Cheh!
I want to like Mary Cheh but experience with her had been that she's good on lip service but very bad on delivery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I live in Ward 4 and I expect Bowser to make a statement too. I don't care that she's running for mayor...she's still my rep. And Catania needs to make his position clear too. You can't chair the Ed Committee and NOT ring in on these proposals.
Bowser's statement will be as vague as possible, she's searching for support east of the river. Fortunately she's got race and the Dem machine on her side. Catania's position is going to be the most interesting and complex. He's smarter than Bowser and Gray combined (though so is my cat). He's certainly the most informed about Education and attuned to the differences between charters and DCPS. He's probably unelectable, being white, gay, and non-Dem, but I'll vote for him anyway. Cheh is like an exotic plant, she couldn't survive outside of Ward 3.
Wow, that's a not so subtle dog whistle there. Agree with 11:54, Gray may have bungled his rep and political future if it is ever proven that he engaged in the shadow campaign. That said, Gray, Mendelson, Catania, Cheh, Evans - all four are quality, engaged, knowledgeable pols.
There's nothing subtle in my assertion that large swaths of DC will vote against Catania because he is A) white, B) gay, and C) not a Democrat. I'm openly calling out the city on its biases, and I'm not afraid to say so. The racists, homophobes, and closedminded Democrats-uber-alles voters of this city absolutely cannot and will not open their eyes to the fact that he is far more competent than his opponent. DC likes to think it cares about diversity, but it does not and just wait until the general election for proof.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see a lot of specifics in what she's saying.
Neighborhood kids to neighborhood schools? Is there a change in Ward 3 that couldn't be characterized that way? There's not a whole lot of neighborhood kids at Eaton or Oyster, Key kids can still go to a nearby school, just not the one they used to.
Grandfathering? Everyone knows there's going to be grandfathering.
My prediction is she declares victory when grandfathering is announced and waves as the boundary changes go by.
Yes, the change in the Murch boundary is very much a change in neighborhood kids not going to Neighborhood schools. Kids who live a block or two from Murch who are currently inbounds for Murch will now walk a little under a mile to Hearst under all three proposals.
Anonymous wrote:I don't see a lot of specifics in what she's saying.
Neighborhood kids to neighborhood schools? Is there a change in Ward 3 that couldn't be characterized that way? There's not a whole lot of neighborhood kids at Eaton or Oyster, Key kids can still go to a nearby school, just not the one they used to.
Grandfathering? Everyone knows there's going to be grandfathering.
My prediction is she declares victory when grandfathering is announced and waves as the boundary changes go by.
Anonymous wrote:I like Mary Cheh!