Anonymous wrote:Those who had Mirena, did you have any side effects from the hormones? Notbbreastfeeding so milk supply isn't a concern.
Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for the info, I will be sure to ask her about this at my follow up apt!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some info - just because I had a GREAT experience with Nexplanon and am getting my second one placed next week. I heavily, heavily researched it (I had no idea about it, I was still stuck in thinking of awful norplant), and I also very heavily researched IUDs.
"Within 1 week of removing the Nexplanon implant, etonogestrel serum levels can no longer be detected. This means that there is the potential for a rapid return of the user’s pre-existing fertility, depending on her age at the time of removal. Clinical data show that 3 weeks after the contraceptive implant is removed, more than 90% of women begin to ovulate."
http://www.nexplanon.co.uk/170/Return-of-fertility
For a non-company source: https://www.uhs.uga.edu/sexualhealth/contraception/nexplanon.html
Clots aren't even really brought up as a risk with Nexplanon. The biggest risk is irregular/unpredictable bleeding that the woman finds intolerable. Mine went really well, no period for the first year, a period every 3 months the second year, and then it was starting to get more regular in the 3rd year when I had it removed. My doctor said there is some research that shows if you have it put in during the first 5 days of your cycle, it reduces the chances of you being in the portion of women that have unpredictable bleeding, and it did hold true for me. My doctor and most of her nurses chose Nexplanon (I went in asking for it, she didn't sell me on it - but then she gave me some additional good info).
I'd be really concerned about a midwife who wrote off Nexplanon but was considering Mirena... that is pretty uneducated/ignorant of today's options.
Thanks for the info, I will be sure to ask her about this at my follow up apt!

Anonymous wrote:Some info - just because I had a GREAT experience with Nexplanon and am getting my second one placed next week. I heavily, heavily researched it (I had no idea about it, I was still stuck in thinking of awful norplant), and I also very heavily researched IUDs.
"Within 1 week of removing the Nexplanon implant, etonogestrel serum levels can no longer be detected. This means that there is the potential for a rapid return of the user’s pre-existing fertility, depending on her age at the time of removal. Clinical data show that 3 weeks after the contraceptive implant is removed, more than 90% of women begin to ovulate."
http://www.nexplanon.co.uk/170/Return-of-fertility
For a non-company source: https://www.uhs.uga.edu/sexualhealth/contraception/nexplanon.html
Clots aren't even really brought up as a risk with Nexplanon. The biggest risk is irregular/unpredictable bleeding that the woman finds intolerable. Mine went really well, no period for the first year, a period every 3 months the second year, and then it was starting to get more regular in the 3rd year when I had it removed. My doctor said there is some research that shows if you have it put in during the first 5 days of your cycle, it reduces the chances of you being in the portion of women that have unpredictable bleeding, and it did hold true for me. My doctor and most of her nurses chose Nexplanon (I went in asking for it, she didn't sell me on it - but then she gave me some additional good info).
I'd be really concerned about a midwife who wrote off Nexplanon but was considering Mirena... that is pretty uneducated/ignorant of today's options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nexplanon over Mirena - I don't see ANY benefits to getting a hormonal IUD vs the implant.
If you don't want hormones obviously Paragard is your only option.
Because of the serious side effects of blood clots. Wasn't even recommended by my midwife. Also, studies have shown your fertility isn't restored for up to 1.5 years after removal. Takes the longest time to have fertility restored compared to other forms of bc.
Anonymous wrote:Nexplanon over Mirena - I don't see ANY benefits to getting a hormonal IUD vs the implant.
If you don't want hormones obviously Paragard is your only option.
Anonymous wrote:I had mirena for about two years. The hormones didn't bother me at all, probably because it is such a tiny amount and it stays localized whereas pills are systemic so you can have a lot more side effects. I stopped having my period which was great, I did have some cramping when I would have had my period, nothing too severe. Insertion was painful. I would definitely recommend it. Oh and my sex drive stayed the same as far as I could tell, I've always been a couple of times a week kind of person and that didn't change.