Anonymous wrote:The traditional 3 w schools are Whitman, Churchill, and WJ. Some people now include Wootton in that group, it is a good school certainly but probably a wrung below those 3.
Anonymous wrote:Even the Washington Post has referred to "the W schools" -- and they have always been Whitman, Wootton, Walter Johnson, and Winston Churchill.
What sets these schools apart? They still have predominantly white students from upper income homes, and parents will pay a premium to move into the clusters that feed into these schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^I didn't conjure the phrase out of thin air. Just saw it used a lot in the last week, so I was curious.
Interesting, I have a kid in one and have not heard it referred to as 3. Some people do debate whether WJ belongs. In the old days it was Wootton who was more tangential because of geography. But for the last decade or so it's been 4 schools. The 4 schools even do pre-season play days among them in some sports.
And to the person who keeps raising it on every thread - no Watkins Mill and Wheaton are not generally considered Ws even though they begin with the same letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^I didn't conjure the phrase out of thin air. Just saw it used a lot in the last week, so I was curious.
Interesting, I have a kid in one and have not heard it referred to as 3. Some people do debate whether WJ belongs. In the old days it was Wootton who was more tangential because of geography. But for the last decade or so it's been 4 schools. The 4 schools even do pre-season play days among them in some sports.
And to the person who keeps raising it on every thread - no Watkins Mill and Wheaton are not generally considered Ws even though they begin with the same letter.
Anonymous wrote:^I didn't conjure the phrase out of thin air. Just saw it used a lot in the last week, so I was curious.
Anonymous wrote:It funny you think you saw three Ws. It has always been four Ws.