Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so.....what should one say instead? I'll get back to you in an hour? 2 hours? Next week? Do you want people to be specific with a time or just phrase it differently?
Phrase it differently. Perhaps you should use the following phrase in your message: "I will return your call as soon as I improve my reading and comprehension skills."
Anonymous wrote:Ok, so.....what should one say instead? I'll get back to you in an hour? 2 hours? Next week? Do you want people to be specific with a time or just phrase it differently?
Anonymous wrote:"I will be out of the office, returning on XXX, with limited/no access to phone/email. Replies may be delayed in my absence, but I will return your message as soon as possible.
Best/Thanks,"
Anonymous wrote:This reminds me of one of the habits of a former manager, which was to say "I'm more than welcome to" do something. So, "I'm more than welcome to stop by your office and discuss this further."
I knew she had just mashed "I'm more than happy to" and "you're more than welcome to," but the result was like nails on a chalkboard every time she said it.
+1Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is one of my BIGGEST pet peeves. Do people not get how self-centered it sounds in a business environment?
I totally agree! I have always just assumed that the person leaving the message does not understand what he/she is saying!
I just assume the person is dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I use the phrase "Please [do X] at your earliest convenience" when I am requesting deliverables and trying to be passive-aggressive because nobody has met their deadline.
What a bitch! I use it when they have done time. If they are overdue, then I ask for an updated timeline of when I should expect it. Passive agressiveness causes confusion and makes you look like a short-sighted bitch.
And cowardly. It's poor leadership. Grow a pair and have a discussion.
Discussions have been had. This is a monthly deliverable due on the 1st of the month, which has never changed. I have set up calendar reminders for everyone in addition to the discussions we have been required to have. So, now I say "at your earliest convenience."
Nobody is saying they aren't wrong to be late. But you are handling it wrong. Say what you mean because you look like an ineffective idiot when you don't. Tell them. I needed it by yesterday, by when will I get it? Generally, you should never, ever try to be passive aggressive. There are zero benefits and your wimpiness in employing the tactic makes you a terrible leader.
PP again, have already tried the alternatives. This has been going on for over 10 months, every month. I'm not in a leadership role, actually, which is why I think no one takes the deadline seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I use the phrase "Please [do X] at your earliest convenience" when I am requesting deliverables and trying to be passive-aggressive because nobody has met their deadline.
Your use of the phrase might not be effective, but it isn't rude.
"Please do X at YOUR earliest convenience' is fine... if that's what you mean. It means please do something, as soon as is reasonably convenient to you. Fine.
I will get back to you "at MY earliest convenience" is rude. It means, "I'll get back to you as soon as I feel like it" which is likely true, but rude to admit.
"as soon as possible" would be less rude. "as soon as is convenient to me" - rude