Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a devout Catholic and I'm on DC Urban Moms daily, and I don't hate my fellow Catholics. I wouldn't agree that Catholic schools are held in low regard here. I think most of the comments are truthful analysis based on personal experiences. But it's easy for Catholics to believe they are being descriminated against because so often in the past, they were.
I think the problem is that, while some parochial schools are great and many are good, they can't really compare with the many top-notch privates or public schools in the area, so they end up attracting either folks who can't get into either, or who are driven mostly by Catholic beliefs.
Not buying that it's people who can't get in. We have no problem getting into the top notch privates. We do have major trouble affording top notch privates. I bet a lot are like us.
Net net it's the same. Parochial is your second, not first, choice.
Correct, but you were implying that the student body was lower quality. I don't buy that part.
I don't think PP was arguing that the student quality is lower, just that the teaching/academics are lower. Most people I know who send their kids to parochial schools would send their kids to independent if the cost were the same.
Most the people I know wouldn't send their kids to independent schools even if it were less expensive.
That's for sure.
Maybe she's talking about the Protestants that send their kids to Catholic Schools because they like the price.
Protestants usually pay a higher rate since they are not parishioners of the Catholic church giving money to the Catholic Church. Usually there are three to four scales: 1) parishioner in good standing in that particular Catholic Church; 2) parishioner not in good standing but in that Catholic Church's parish; 3) parishioners in good standing in other parishes (but sometimes need letters confirming they are in good standing in their own parish); and 4) all others.
Anonymous wrote:If you read these forums long you will read about children moving from private to public and being behind and vice versa. You will read about boys from Beauvoir being behind in math when they enter St. Albans. You can find a post about a child leaving almost any school in town and being behind. No two private schools cover all the same skills in the same grade. Our child learns quickly and doesn't need a $30,000. a year school for the elementary years. There are many wonderful public, private and Catholic schools in the DC area. There are good teachers and bad teachers at all of the schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a devout Catholic and I'm on DC Urban Moms daily, and I don't hate my fellow Catholics. I wouldn't agree that Catholic schools are held in low regard here. I think most of the comments are truthful analysis based on personal experiences. But it's easy for Catholics to believe they are being descriminated against because so often in the past, they were.
I think the problem is that, while some parochial schools are great and many are good, they can't really compare with the many top-notch privates or public schools in the area, so they end up attracting either folks who can't get into either, or who are driven mostly by Catholic beliefs.
Not buying that it's people who can't get in. We have no problem getting into the top notch privates. We do have major trouble affording top notch privates. I bet a lot are like us.
Net net it's the same. Parochial is your second, not first, choice.
Correct, but you were implying that the student body was lower quality. I don't buy that part.
I don't think PP was arguing that the student quality is lower, just that the teaching/academics are lower. Most people I know who send their kids to parochial schools would send their kids to independent if the cost were the same.
Most the people I know wouldn't send their kids to independent schools even if it were less expensive.
That's for sure.
Maybe she's talking about the Protestants that send their kids to Catholic Schools because they like the price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a devout Catholic and I'm on DC Urban Moms daily, and I don't hate my fellow Catholics. I wouldn't agree that Catholic schools are held in low regard here. I think most of the comments are truthful analysis based on personal experiences. But it's easy for Catholics to believe they are being descriminated against because so often in the past, they were.
I think the problem is that, while some parochial schools are great and many are good, they can't really compare with the many top-notch privates or public schools in the area, so they end up attracting either folks who can't get into either, or who are driven mostly by Catholic beliefs.
Not buying that it's people who can't get in. We have no problem getting into the top notch privates. We do have major trouble affording top notch privates. I bet a lot are like us.
Net net it's the same. Parochial is your second, not first, choice.
Correct, but you were implying that the student body was lower quality. I don't buy that part.
I don't think PP was arguing that the student quality is lower, just that the teaching/academics are lower. Most people I know who send their kids to parochial schools would send their kids to independent if the cost were the same.
Most the people I know wouldn't send their kids to independent schools even if it were less expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a devout Catholic and I'm on DC Urban Moms daily, and I don't hate my fellow Catholics. I wouldn't agree that Catholic schools are held in low regard here. I think most of the comments are truthful analysis based on personal experiences. But it's easy for Catholics to believe they are being descriminated against because so often in the past, they were.
I think the problem is that, while some parochial schools are great and many are good, they can't really compare with the many top-notch privates or public schools in the area, so they end up attracting either folks who can't get into either, or who are driven mostly by Catholic beliefs.
Not buying that it's people who can't get in. We have no problem getting into the top notch privates. We do have major trouble affording top notch privates. I bet a lot are like us.
Net net it's the same. Parochial is your second, not first, choice.
Correct, but you were implying that the student body was lower quality. I don't buy that part.
I don't think PP was arguing that the student quality is lower, just that the teaching/academics are lower. Most people I know who send their kids to parochial schools would send their kids to independent if the cost were the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a devout Catholic and I'm on DC Urban Moms daily, and I don't hate my fellow Catholics. I wouldn't agree that Catholic schools are held in low regard here. I think most of the comments are truthful analysis based on personal experiences. But it's easy for Catholics to believe they are being descriminated against because so often in the past, they were.
I think the problem is that, while some parochial schools are great and many are good, they can't really compare with the many top-notch privates or public schools in the area, so they end up attracting either folks who can't get into either, or who are driven mostly by Catholic beliefs.
Not buying that it's people who can't get in. We have no problem getting into the top notch privates. We do have major trouble affording top notch privates. I bet a lot are like us.
Net net it's the same. Parochial is your second, not first, choice.
Correct, but you were implying that the student body was lower quality. I don't buy that part.